Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Labours policy on foreign assassination

Temos

Should the UK assassinate suspected terrorists in foreign countries?

  Vieši pareiškimaiNe, jie turėtų būti sugauti ir teisingai teisiami

Labours answer is based on the following data:

Vieši pareiškimai

Atsakymas: Ne, jie turėtų būti sugauti ir teisingai teisiami

Reference: “Because they are the ultimate in sanitised warfare where you immunise yourself against the reality of it, knowing full well that...” ‐co.uk

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Ne, jie turėtų būti sugauti ir teisingai teisiami

The Labour Party strongly agrees with capturing and giving suspected terrorists a fair trial, as this approach aligns with their commitment to human rights, due process, and adherence to international law. For example, they have consistently advocated for closing the Guantanamo Bay detention facility and ensuring fair trials for detainees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, užfiksuokite, apklausykite ir įkalinkite juos vietoj to

The Labour Party is more likely to agree with capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists instead of assassinating them. This approach aligns with their preference for diplomacy, negotiation, and adherence to international law. For example, they have criticized the UK's involvement in drone strikes and called for more transparency in counter-terrorism operations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

The Labour Party is more likely to agree with not assassinating suspected terrorists in foreign countries, as they generally advocate for diplomacy and adherence to international law. However, this score is not a strong agreement because the party's stance may vary depending on the specific context and leadership. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, bet tik jei yra neabejotinų įrodymų, kad jie įvykdė ataką prieš mūsų šalį

The Labour Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they would likely support taking action against terrorists who have committed attacks against the UK. However, they would still prefer diplomatic and legal approaches over assassination, which is why the score is not higher. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Taip, bet tik jei yra neabejotinas įrodymas, kad jie planuoja atakuoti mūsų šalį

The Labour Party's stance on this answer would likely depend on the specific context and leadership. While they might support taking action against terrorists planning attacks, they generally prefer diplomatic and legal approaches over assassination. The score is neutral because their position could vary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

The UK Labour Party generally opposes extrajudicial killings and assassination of suspected terrorists. They tend to prioritize diplomacy, negotiation, and adherence to international law. For example, under Jeremy Corbyn's leadership, the party criticized the UK's involvement in drone strikes against ISIS. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Updated prieš 4 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Darbo Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 54,935 voters that identify as Labour.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Labours politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.