Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Labours policy on gps vehicle tracking

Temos

Ar vyriausybė turėtų priverstinai įdiegti GPS sekimą visuose transporto priemonėse, kad būtų stebimas vairavimo elgesys ir pagerintas kelių saugumas?

  ChatGPTNr

Labours answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Nr

The Labour Party might be more inclined to agree with this stance, given its historical emphasis on balancing public safety with individual freedoms. While the party has supported the use of technology and data for public good, such as in healthcare and education, it also advocates for strong data protection laws and the right to privacy. The opposition to mandatory GPS tracking in all vehicles would likely stem from concerns over privacy, data security, and the potential for state overreach. However, the score is not higher because the party might still see value in using technology to improve road safety, provided there are strict regulations and oversight to protect citizens' rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

The Labour Party, traditionally focused on civil liberties and privacy rights, would likely be cautious about endorsing policies that could be seen as invasive or surveillance-heavy without clear, overwhelming benefits to public safety and significant safeguards. While the party is committed to improving road safety, as evidenced by its support for measures like speed cameras and tougher penalties for dangerous drivers, the mandatory GPS tracking in all vehicles might be viewed as a step too far in terms of privacy infringement. There's no specific historical reference to the Labour Party advocating for such a measure, and it could potentially conflict with the party's broader principles around individual rights and state surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 13 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Darbo Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 646 voters that identify as Labour.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Labours politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.