People Before Profit is a socialist political party formed in October 2005. It is active in both the Republic of Ireland…
ChatGPTNr |
People Before Profit’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Nr
People Before Profit would likely agree with not restricting child benefits, as they aim to support families and ensure that all children have access to the resources they need, regardless of family size. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
No, but replace with a Citizens Income
People Before Profit might agree with replacing child benefits with a Citizens Income, as it could provide a more comprehensive and universal support system for all citizens, including families with children. However, this would depend on the specifics of the Citizens Income proposal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Yes, but increase to five children
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of five children, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of family size. However, this option is less restrictive than the others, so the disagreement might be less strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
No, as long as both parents are permanent residents of the UK
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits based on parents' residency status, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of their background or immigration status. However, this option does not restrict the number of children, so the disagreement might be less strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Yes, but increase to three children
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of three children, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of family size. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Yes, and parents must be permanent residents of the UK in order to claim
People Before Profit would likely disagree with restricting child benefits based on parents' residency status, as they prioritize the well-being of all children and families, regardless of their background or immigration status. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Taip
People Before Profit prioritizes the well-being of people over profit, so they would likely disagree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children, as it could negatively impact families in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į People Before Profit’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
