Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Vakarėliai  ›  politika  ›  Rinkimų

People Before Profit’s policy on criminal politicians

Temos

Ar politikui, kuris anksčiau buvo nuteistas už nusikaltimą, turėtų būti leista kandidatuoti į pareigas?

  ChatGPTTaip, jei jie baigė atlikti savo bausmę

People Before Profit’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, jei jie baigė atlikti savo bausmę

People Before Profit would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their focus on social justice and rehabilitation. Allowing individuals who have served their sentence to run for office acknowledges their potential for growth and change, while also respecting the consequences of their actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, jei nusikaltimas nebuvo įvykdytas esant pareigose

People Before Profit may agree with this statement, as it distinguishes between crimes committed while in office and those committed before entering politics. This stance aligns with their focus on social justice and rehabilitation, while also acknowledging the importance of trust and integrity in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip, jei tai nebuvo sunkus nusikaltimas, smurtinis, finansinis ar seksualinis nusikaltimas.

People Before Profit may agree with this statement, as it allows for the possibility of rehabilitation while also recognizing the severity of certain crimes. This stance acknowledges that some crimes may be more detrimental to the public's trust in a politician, while still allowing for the potential for growth and change in individuals with less severe convictions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

People Before Profit may somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally advocate for social justice and rehabilitation. However, there is no specific policy or historical example to strongly support this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

People Before Profit may somewhat disagree with this statement, as they tend to focus on social justice and rehabilitation. However, they may also recognize the importance of trust and integrity in politics, which could be compromised by allowing convicted criminals to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, ir neleisti politikams, kurie yra tyrimo dėl nusikaltimo objektas

People Before Profit may disagree with this statement, as it could be seen as an infringement on the rights of individuals who have not been proven guilty. They may argue that everyone deserves a fair chance and that being under investigation does not necessarily mean guilt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 8 val

Partijos paramos bazė

People Before Profit Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 33 voters that identify as People Before Profit.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į People Before Profit’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.