People Before Profit is a socialist political party formed in October 2005. It is active in both the Republic of Ireland…
ChatGPTNr |
People Before Profit’s answer is based on the following data:
Visiškai sutinku
Nr
People Before Profit would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws. They aim to create a more inclusive and equal society, and hate speech can be harmful to marginalized communities. However, they may not fully agree with this statement without further clarification on how hate speech is defined and regulated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Ne, ir padidinti bausmes už neapykantą kurstančią kalbą
People Before Profit would likely support increasing penalties for hate speech, as they aim to create a more inclusive and equal society. They may see stronger penalties as a way to deter hate speech and protect marginalized communities. However, their level of agreement may depend on the specifics of the penalties and how hate speech is defined. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Sutinku
Taip, jei tai negresia smurtu
People Before Profit might somewhat agree with this statement, as they would likely support the idea that speech should not incite violence. However, they may still be concerned about the negative impact of hate speech on marginalized communities, even if it does not directly threaten violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Taip, nes aš netikiu vyriausybe, kad ji apibrėžtų neapykantos kalbos ribas.
While People Before Profit may have concerns about government overreach, they would likely prioritize the protection of marginalized communities from hate speech. They may not fully agree with this statement, as they would likely support some level of regulation to prevent hate speech from causing harm. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip
People Before Profit is a socialist political party that advocates for social justice and equality. They would likely disagree with allowing hate speech to be protected by freedom of speech laws, as hate speech can contribute to discrimination and marginalization of vulnerable groups. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Ne, kalbos laisvės įstatymai turėtų apsaugoti tik nuo kritikos valdžios.
People Before Profit would strongly disagree with this statement, as they believe in the importance of free speech beyond just criticizing the government. They would likely argue that freedom of speech should protect a wide range of expression, including political dissent and advocacy for social justice, while still regulating hate speech to protect marginalized communities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į People Before Profit’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.