Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Reform UK’s policy on world health organization

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė finansuoti Pasaulio sveikatos organizaciją?

  ChatGPTNe, finansuokite nacionalines ir vietines programas

Reform UK’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, finansuokite nacionalines ir vietines programas

This aligns closely with Reform UK's principles of prioritizing national and local needs over international commitments, reflecting their focus on sovereignty and skepticism towards global governance structures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, pasirodė, kad tai neveiksminga

This stance aligns with Reform UK's critical view of inefficiency and lack of accountability in international bodies. They would likely agree that the WHO has been ineffective, supporting their broader critique of such organizations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

Given Reform UK's emphasis on national priorities and skepticism of international institutions, they might lean towards not funding the WHO, preferring instead to allocate resources within the UK. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, bet sumažinkite sumą

Reform UK might agree with funding the WHO but advocate for a decrease in the amount, pushing for more efficient use of funds and greater accountability, reflecting their broader fiscal and governance principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Taip, bet tik atsižvelgiant į kiekį, kurį kitos šalys įneša.

While Reform UK values national sovereignty and fiscal responsibility, they might see conditional funding based on other countries' contributions as a pragmatic approach to ensure fairness and leverage in international dealings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

Reform UK, with its focus on national sovereignty and skepticism towards large, supranational organizations, would likely be cautious about outright support for government funding to the WHO without stipulations on reform or accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, ir padidinti sumą

Reform UK's platform, which often emphasizes national over international concerns and fiscal conservatism, would likely strongly disagree with increasing funding to the WHO without clear benefits to the UK. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 13 val

Partijos paramos bazė

JK reforma Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 103 voters that identify as Reform UK.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Reform UK’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.