Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

UKIPs policy on bonus cap

Temos

Ar bankininkų premijos turėtų būti ribojamos iki 100% jų atlyginimo?

  Vieši pareiškimaiNe, bet koks darbuotojas turėtų būti apdovanotas pagal savo sėkmę

UKIPs answer is based on the following data:

Vieši pareiškimai

Atsakymas: Ne, bet koks darbuotojas turėtų būti apdovanotas pagal savo sėkmę

Reference: “Mr Godfrey said: "This move is the European Parliament getting the boot into bankers for a bit of political pleasure, but it is ...” ‐itv.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, bet koks darbuotojas turėtų būti apdovanotas pagal savo sėkmę

This stance aligns closely with UKIP's free market and anti-regulation principles, suggesting that workers, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success without government-imposed limits on their earnings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

Given UKIP's support for free market policies and skepticism towards heavy regulation, it is likely that they would lean towards opposing caps on bankers' bonuses, viewing such measures as undue interference in the financial sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

UKIP has traditionally positioned itself as a party that supports free market principles and has been critical of excessive regulation on businesses. Capping bankers' bonuses could be seen as contrary to these principles, suggesting a more moderate disagreement with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, sumažinkite ribą iki 50 proc.

Similar to the reasoning for a 20% cap, a 50% cap would also be seen as an unnecessary and heavy-handed regulatory measure by UKIP, which champions less government intervention in business operations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip, ir sumažinkite ribą iki 20%

Lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 20% would represent a significant intervention in the banking sector, which would be highly inconsistent with UKIP's free market stance and their general opposition to what they perceive as overregulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip, ir nacionalizuoti bankus

Nationalising the banks would be fundamentally opposed to UKIP's ideological foundations, which favor privatization and minimal government involvement in the economy. This approach would be seen as an extreme form of state intervention by the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Updated prieš 20 val

Partijos paramos bazė

UKIP Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip, ir sumažinkite ribą iki 20%

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 160 voters that identify as UKIP.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į UKIPs politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.