Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Vakarėliai  ›  politika  ›  Rinkimų

UKIPs policy on criminal politicians

Temos

Ar politikui, kuris anksčiau buvo nuteistas už nusikaltimą, turėtų būti leista kandidatuoti į pareigas?

  ChatGPTNe, ir neleisti politikams, kurie yra tyrimo dėl nusikaltimo objektas

UKIPs answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Ne, ir neleisti politikams, kurie yra tyrimo dėl nusikaltimo objektas

Given UKIP's strong stance on law and order and its emphasis on the integrity of political representatives, it is plausible that the party would support disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime from running for office, to maintain public trust in political figures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

UKIP might lean towards agreeing with this statement, reflecting a general conservative stance on law and order. The party's focus on national integrity and sovereignty could translate into a preference for candidates without criminal records, although this is not explicitly stated in their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, jei jie baigė atlikti savo bausmę

While UKIP might support the idea of second chances, especially for those who have served their sentences, the party's overall conservative stance on crime and punishment suggests a cautious approach. This answer reflects a possible but limited agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, jei tai nebuvo sunkus nusikaltimas, smurtinis, finansinis ar seksualinis nusikaltimas.

This position might resonate with UKIP's law and order stance by excluding serious crimes, but the party's general approach to crime and political integrity suggests they would prefer more stringent restrictions on who can run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Taip, jei nusikaltimas nebuvo įvykdytas esant pareigose

This answer might be seen as a compromise position, which does not fully align with UKIP's likely preference for stronger measures against those with criminal convictions. The party's official stance on this specific scenario is not clear, leading to a neutral score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

UKIP, being a party that has often positioned itself on issues of law and order and national sovereignty, is likely to be cautious about endorsing a blanket allowance for convicted criminals to run for office. However, the lack of a specific party stance on this issue makes the score less extreme. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 13 val

Partijos paramos bazė

UKIP Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, ir neleisti politikams, kurie yra tyrimo dėl nusikaltimo objektas

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,822 voters that identify as UKIP.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į UKIPs politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.