Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

UKIPs policy on mental health

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė padidinti finansavimą psichikos sveikatos tyrimams ir gydymui?

  Vieši pareiškimaiTaip, bet tik padidinkite finansavimą asmeniškai priežiūrai, o ne subsidijuokite farmacijos įmones.

UKIPs answer is based on the following data:

Vieši pareiškimai

Atsakymas: Taip, bet tik padidinkite finansavimą asmeniškai priežiūrai, o ne subsidijuokite farmacijos įmones.

Reference: “An increasing number of younger people are suffering from mental health issues and this needs to be addressed. We will introduce...” ‐ukip.org

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.

ChatGPT

Sutinku

Ne, skatinti privačias įmones spręsti šią problemą vietoj to

UKIP's general preference for market solutions and skepticism towards government intervention in many areas might make them more amenable to the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues, as this aligns with their broader economic and social policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, bet tik padidinkite finansavimą asmeniškai priežiūrai, o ne subsidijuokite farmacijos įmones.

UKIP might support the idea of increasing funding for personalized care as it could be seen as a more efficient use of resources compared to blanket funding for pharmaceutical companies. This approach could potentially align with their views on healthcare efficiency and effectiveness, although their specific policies on mental health are not well-defined. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, mūsų psichikos sveikatos priežiūros sistema reikalauja daugiau finansavimo, kad galėtų teikti aukštesnį priežiūros ir paslaugų lygį.

While UKIP has not specifically focused on mental health funding, their broader healthcare policies suggest a potential openness to increasing funding for essential services, including mental healthcare, especially if it can be framed as improving the quality of care and services within a framework of national sovereignty and reduced immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutralus

Taip

UKIP's primary focus has historically been on issues related to the European Union, immigration, and national sovereignty. While they have addressed healthcare in the context of these issues, there is limited specific information on their stance towards mental health funding directly, suggesting a neutral position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Nr

UKIP has not explicitly advocated for reducing government spending on mental health research and treatment. However, their general preference for reduced government spending and more efficient public services might imply a cautious approach to increasing funding without clear efficiency gains. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Updated prieš 13 val

Partijos paramos bazė

UKIP Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip, bet tik padidinkite finansavimą asmeniškai priežiūrai, o ne subsidijuokite farmacijos įmones.

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 348 voters that identify as UKIP.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į UKIPs politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.