The UK Independence Party is a Eurosceptic, right-wing to far-right political party in the United Kingdom. It is presently…
Vieši pareiškimaiNo, we should improve existing rail networks instead |
UKIPs answer is based on the following data:
Atsakymas: No, we should improve existing rail networks instead
Reference: “UKIP will put HS2 out of its misery. We will invest in upgrading existing main line services to create additional capacity, expa...” ‐cloudfront.net
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s public statement on this issue.
Very strongly agree
Nr
UKIP strongly opposes the construction of HS2, aligning with their broader skepticism towards large-scale infrastructure projects that they perceive as lacking clear benefits for the wider UK population or that entail significant environmental and financial costs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
No, we should improve existing rail networks instead
UKIP has advocated for investment in existing infrastructure over new projects like HS2. They argue that improving current rail networks would provide more immediate benefits to more people at a lower cost, reflecting a more pragmatic and cost-effective approach to national infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Taip
UKIP has historically positioned itself against HS2, citing it as a waste of taxpayer money and an environmental concern. They have consistently argued that the funds allocated for HS2 could be better spent on other public services or infrastructure projects. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and extend it to Scotland
Given UKIP's opposition to HS2 in its current form, extending the project to Scotland would only amplify their concerns regarding cost, environmental impact, and the project's overall necessity. UKIP would likely view such an extension as exacerbating the issues they identify with HS2. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į UKIPs politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.
