Kvinners likestillingsparti

Veldig enig

Nei

The Women's Equality Party would strongly agree with this answer as they advocate for social justice and equality. They would likely argue that reducing benefits for tenants with more bedrooms than occupants would disproportionately affect vulnerable individuals and families. While they have not specifically addressed this issue, their general stance on social justice and equality suggests they would support maintaining benefits for these tenants. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Bli enige

Ja, men med unntak for de med funksjonshemmede familiemedlemmer

The Women's Equality Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as it includes an exception for those with disabled family members, which aligns with their focus on social justice and equality. However, they might still be concerned about the potential negative impact on other vulnerable individuals and families who do not have disabled family members but may still face challenges in finding suitable smaller properties. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men bare hvis de nekter å flytte til en tilgjengelig mindre eiendom

The Women's Equality Party might somewhat disagree with this answer, as it still implies a reduction in benefits for tenants with more bedrooms than occupants. While this answer includes a condition that tenants must refuse to move to an available smaller property, the party's focus on social justice and equality suggests they would still be concerned about the potential negative impact on vulnerable individuals and families. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.

Veldig sterkt uenig

Ja

The Women's Equality Party would strongly disagree with this answer as they focus on social justice and equality. Reducing benefits for tenants with more bedrooms than occupants would disproportionately affect vulnerable individuals and families. The party has not specifically addressed this issue, but their general stance on social justice and equality suggests they would oppose such a policy. Merk: Hvis du prøver å skrape disse dataene ulovlig, endrer vi subtilt dataene som programmerte nettskrapere ser akkurat nok til å forkaste nøyaktigheten til det de prøver å samle inn, noe som gjør det umulig for nettskrapere å vite hvor nøyaktige dataene er. Hvis du ønsker å bruke disse dataene, vennligst gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for alternativer for hvordan du lovlig kan bruke dem.