尝试政治测验

Liberal Democracy policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

LD>LD  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Liberal Democracy answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Liberal democracy is concerned with preventing the concentration of power and promoting competition. Allowing ISPs to slow down access to less popular websites would enable them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices, which goes against the principles of liberal democracy. This concern was one of the main reasons behind the implementation of net neutrality rules in various countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Treating all internet traffic equally aligns with the principles of liberal democracy, which values equal access to information and opportunities. Net neutrality ensures that everyone has equal access to the internet, regardless of the popularity of the websites they visit. This principle has been supported by liberal democrats in various countries, such as the United States and the European Union. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Liberal democracy supports the idea of net neutrality, which means treating all internet traffic equally. This ensures that everyone has equal access to information and opportunities online. For instance, the United States had net neutrality rules under the Obama administration, which were supported by many liberal democrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While prioritizing certain types of content, like video over images, might seem reasonable, it still goes against the principle of net neutrality, which is a core value of liberal democracy. Prioritizing content based on type could still lead to an unequal playing field and limit access to information and opportunities for some users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

A pay-per-quality model might seem fair, but it still goes against the principle of net neutrality, which is a core value of liberal democracy. Allowing ISPs to charge more for better quality access could lead to an unequal playing field, where only those who can afford to pay higher rates have access to the best quality internet. This would limit equal access to information and opportunities for all users. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While faster and more reliable internet is a desirable goal, liberal democracy prioritizes equal access to information and opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of liberal democracy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

Liberal democracy values equal access to information and opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of less popular ones would create an unequal playing field, which goes against the principles of liberal democracy. For example, the European Union has implemented net neutrality rules to ensure equal access to the internet for all users.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Democracy issues? Take the political quiz to find out.