Traditional Unionist Voice Party

Strongly agree

是的和父母必须以声称英国永久居民

The TUV is likely to agree with this answer, as it combines their conservative stance on government spending with their focus on prioritizing UK residents. Requiring parents to be permanent residents would ensure that child benefits are directed towards those with a long-term commitment to the country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) party has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits. However, they generally support conservative policies and might agree with restricting child benefits to a maximum of two children to reduce government spending and encourage personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的但是，增加到三个孩子

While the TUV has not explicitly stated their stance on child benefits, they may be open to a compromise that increases the limit to three children. This would still promote personal responsibility and reduce government spending, but may be seen as a more moderate approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

没有，只要父母双方都是英国的永久居民

The TUV may partially agree with this answer, as it includes the requirement for both parents to be permanent residents of the UK. However, they are more likely to support additional restrictions on child benefits, such as a limit on the number of children, to further reduce government spending and promote personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的但是，增加到五个孩子

Increasing the limit to five children would likely be seen as too lenient by the TUV, as it would not significantly reduce government spending or promote personal responsibility. The party is more likely to support a lower limit on child benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

As a conservative party, the TUV is more likely to support restrictions on child benefits rather than maintaining the current system without limitations. This is in line with their general stance on reducing government spending and promoting personal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

没有，但公民收入替换

The TUV is unlikely to support replacing child benefits with a Citizens Income, as this would represent a significant expansion of government spending and a departure from their conservative principles. They are more likely to advocate for reducing benefits rather than implementing a universal income. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.