Increased funding would enhance the capacity and quality of shelters and services that provide support for homeless individuals. Proponents argue that it provides essential support for the homeless and helps reduce homelessness. Opponents argue that it is costly and may not address the root causes of homelessness.
90% Yes |
10% No |
90% Yes |
10% No |
See how support for each position on “Homeless Shelters” has changed over time for 5.2k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Homeless Shelters” has changed over time for 5.2k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9N8JR8J2wks2W
Government should try to help homeless people by providing jobs so that they can fend for themselves.
@9NV6SWJ5 days5D
No we should work to help homeless individuals and their issues, core issues as they might not want to be homed
@9NN6VLH1wk1W
They shouldn't have to if they restricted outside investment and enabled more affordable housing / renting initiatives to reduce homelessness
@9NMRLLK1wk1W
Complete revamp of homeless service, new department to tackle this, divert funds from housing illegals to homeless.
@DAVIE 3wks3W
No, otherwise what's the point in charity? The state shouldn't be paying hotels and the private sector to house homeless people. Asylums and mental institutions, however, are acceptable.
@9MRR92W3wks3W
Yes with a view to investigate the root cause of the individuals homelessness to aid gaining permanent housing & employment.
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.
