Chris Elmore

Strongly agree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

The Labour party would likely agree that refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power. They generally support the collective defense principle and the importance of NATO in maintaining global security. However, they may also advocate for increased defense spending commitments from NATO countries to ensure a more equitable distribution of defense responsibilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Labour party generally supports NATO and the collective defense principle. However, they may not fully agree with defending countries with low military budgets without any conditions. The party's stance can vary depending on the leadership, but overall, they would lean towards supporting NATO allies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

While the Labour party may have concerns about countries not meeting their defense spending commitments, they are unlikely to support a blanket refusal to defend NATO countries that spend less than 2% of their GDP on military defense. The party's stance on this issue would likely be more nuanced and focused on encouraging increased defense spending rather than outright refusal to defend allies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Labour party is generally in favor of NATO and its collective defense principle, so they would likely disagree with not defending other NATO countries. However, they may have concerns about countries not meeting their defense spending commitments, which could lead to a more nuanced stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

The Labour party has historically supported NATO and its role in maintaining global security. While some factions within the party may have more critical views of NATO, the overall party stance is in favor of continued membership and cooperation with NATO allies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.