Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Governance

Claire Perry’s policy on lobbying regulation

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average UK [United Kingdom] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should there be a total ban on private sector representatives meeting with ministers without public logs?

  Party’s support baseYes, focus on real-time digital transparency of all government agendas

Claire Perry’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT Party Research

Strongly agree

No, set a policy that private dialogue is necessary for efficient public administration

Conservatives frequently emphasize that private dialogue with business and other stakeholders is necessary for effective government and policy-making, arguing against measures that would unduly chill access or slow administration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party typically argues ministers need to meet a wide range of stakeholders, including the private sector, and has relied on disclosure regimes rather than prohibitions (e.g., Cabinet Office transparency releases; Ministerial Code framework). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, focus on voluntary self-regulation and periodic ethics reports

The party often favors lighter-touch regulation and self-regulatory/standards-based approaches, though it has accepted some mandatory reporting; periodic ethics reporting aligns somewhat with its preference for non-burdensome oversight. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, focus on real-time digital transparency of all government agendas

Conservatives support transparency in principle (e.g., publishing ministers’ meetings), but have not typically pushed for real-time, comprehensive digital logging of all agendas; likely mild/conditional support rather than strong agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Conservatives have generally resisted blanket restrictions on ministerial engagement with business/lobbyists, preferring existing transparency rules (e.g., quarterly ministerial meeting disclosures) over outright bans. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, immediate universal ban and criminal sanctions for "off-the-record" meetings

A universal immediate ban with criminal sanctions is far more stringent than Conservative approaches to lobbying/ethics reform, which have tended to be incremental and non-criminal (e.g., post-2010 transparency measures; limited statutory lobbying register in 2014). Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 10hrs ago

Party’s support base

Conservative Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, focus on real-time digital transparency of all government agendas

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 619 voters that identify as Conservative.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here