Jacob Rees-Mogg

Agree

Yes

The Conservative Party has historically shown support for scientific and medical advancements within a framework of regulation to ensure ethical standards, public safety, and national interest. Their approach to biotechnology and medical ethics suggests a cautious but open stance towards new technologies. Regulation of CRISPR for human genetic modifications would likely be seen as necessary to prevent misuse, ensure ethical considerations, and maintain public trust. This aligns with their broader views on the importance of regulation in areas of significant ethical and societal impact. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Conservative Party, while supportive of innovation and the development of new technologies, typically emphasizes the need for regulation to manage risks and ethical concerns. Their general approach to governance includes a balance between enabling technological and scientific progress and safeguarding public interest through oversight. Therefore, a stance against regulation of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications would be less aligned with their historical approach to similar issues, where they have favored regulatory frameworks to ensure safety, ethical standards, and societal acceptance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.