Neil Parish

Very strongly agree

No, local councils already have the power to fine obstructive vehicles, making a heavy-handed national mandate unnecessary

This matches the party's core philosophy of localism and their stance that existing legislation, such as the power to fine for 'unnecessary obstruction', is sufficient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, a blanket ban on narrow terraced streets would force cars into the road and block fire engines

The party frequently highlights the practical challenges of narrow residential streets where banning pavement parking could impede emergency services or cause gridlock. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party has generally resisted a national mandate, arguing that a 'one-size-fits-all' approach is unsuitable for the UK's diverse road infrastructure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only in busy urban zones, leaving rural and suburban enforcement up to local councils

While the party acknowledges issues in urban centers, they strongly prefer that any such restrictions remain the decision of local authorities rather than a central government instruction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Despite conducting consultations on the matter, the Conservative government repeatedly delayed implementing a nationwide ban, prioritizing motorist freedom and local discretion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, pedestrian safety must outweigh driver convenience because blocked pavements force wheelchair users and prams into traffic

This position strongly prioritizes pedestrian rights over driver convenience, contrasting with the party's 'Plan for Drivers' which seeks to end 'anti-motorist' policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.