@9GT3T836mos6MO
MOST QUALIFIED PERSON SHOULD BE ON THE BORD OF DIRECTORS REGARDLESS OF GENDER. WHAT HAPPENS IF THERE AREN’T ANY WOMEN WHO WANT TO BE ON THE BORD - FORCE THEM TO WORK ?!?!
@9GX4V886mos6MO
The best person for the job should always be chosen. Surely it is sexist for someone to be given a job based on their gender and not on merit?
@9LTC4GB3wks3W
Jobs should be given based on fitment for the role not on gender, race or any other discriminatory factors
Women should only be on the board of directors if they are qualified for it, it should not be about gender but about skill
@9J8NBQG4mos4MO
Companies should hire the most qualified person for the job, and education should be made such that opportunities are available equally to women and men
@9GZY7466mos6MO
women typically go into jobs that are more social and not as demanding as men. with most men working harder and more demanding jobs
@9FV7ZK37mos7MO
One counterargument to the "Yes" position on gender workplace diversity is that prioritizing gender diversity might inadvertently lead to discrimination against other aspects of diversity, such as age, race, or socioeconomic background. Critics argue that focusing solely on gender can overshadow the importance of creating inclusive workplaces that value all forms of diversity. They suggest that a more holistic approach, considering multiple dimensions of diversity, could lead to a fairer and more equitable work environment for everyone.
@9FT8MHX8mos8MO
It is waste of time and pushes those who are best for the roles out of place and leads to incompetence in senior positions.
Companies should hire the most qualified for the job not just tick a box to get someone of a certain gender or ethnicity
@9G8R8F3 7mos7MO
Prioritising women in the workplace is a way to get back power from men who bossed them around in the past
The historical activity of users engaging with this answer.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...