Should the government require children to be vaccinated for preventable diseases?

I don’t trust the government’s decisions and pressure propoganda anymore after seeing kids affected by the covid vaccines.

No it should be the parents choice but full disclosure of what is in the vaccines and how important they are should be provided. So parents are fully informed

More science backed (in basic level English) information should be published to heavily show the benefits for and the risks against. Shouldn't be mandatory

It should be the parents choice and if the child is an older child in high school they can also have an input on the choice after being educated

Yes, but offer three separate vaccines for MMR and allow parents to vaccinate at separate time to other courses

Yes, but only for deadly and harmful diseases, and only if the vaccinations have been tested for a long period of time and are deemed safe for use with little to no effect on future health.

Complicated. Vaccines are great, unless someone's genetic makeup makes them have adverse side effects.

No, there are too many "vaccines" around these days. Investigations into the ethics and effectiveness of them needs to be done as well as side effects.

It should always be the choice of the parent. Individual circumstances should be thought about but public ad campaigns should be funded.

I'm personally in favour of vaccines, but in the case of COVID-19, they clearly don't stop the spread of the disease.

No, parents should be given enough information to make their own decisions as to what vaccines are put into their children's bodies.

No, the government should not be able to force you to take medication, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits.

Should be an option

No but they should encourage it

Yes, except for cases in which it would be medically unsafe (for example, for immunocompromised children who cannot safely receive certain vaccines)

No, we have free will although not vaccinating is a terrible idea unless you know you’re allergic to it

No, let it be a parents choice wether their child has any form of vaccination

Only if parents consent

It should be illegal to not vaccinate your child unless there are extenuating medical circumstances

If you refuse to vaccinate your kids then you must take them out of the public schooling system

Vaccines should never me made mandatory under any circumstances. We need more information on the pros and cons of vaccines and other medicines so parents can make their own fair and just opinion.

it should be recommended but not required, the children's next of kin should be responsible to make their decision based on their beliefs and what they think is best for their child. nobody should be forced but it should be recommended.

It should be very very strongly encouraged but with the exemption of medical reasons and religious reasons

No vaccines should be made available for those who chose to use them, but not mandatory let the parents decide for there own child what is best.

No! The state has no business in the privacy of people's medical decisions. Especially when they're paid to promote the medical products.

No but where non-vaccination results in the need for NHS care, the parent(s) should be financially liable for the cost.

Depends if the pharma companies can be made to be honest about the side effects and made to provide clinical trial data to the public that has not been altered.

No not by law but should encourage as many as possible through education & ad campaigns of benefits and risks, allow exceptions based on beliefs

No, and both make parents criminally responsible for spreading both deadly and less serious diseases, and also allow children to make their own decisions from high school age, and also require vaccinations for deadly diseases to attend any school / group

Yes. But only some that have been tested for years and not whipped up in months like the covid vaccine

Yes so those who cannot be vaccinated for legitimate medical reasons or age will have some degree of protection.

No. Absolutely no way anyone can force any treatment on anyone, but deliver a strong for and against agument with penalties for proven transmission after a refusal for vaccine

No, it should be a personal choice, but I think to go to school you should have one. Have to have one.

It depends on a range of different factors such as religion, chance of having deadly effects of others and the child.

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases and those who can not be vaccinated should be quarantined until they are no longer containous. For non-deadly diseases fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

No, but if the fall ill - the NHS should not be obliged to pay for ongoing care or support after A&E

Up to the parents. What ever fits best and or the individual to make up their own mind if it comes to it

Every parent should have the right to decide what happens to their own child but if there’s an out break have a better safe system in place

No, fund greater education on vaccination, and attempt to combat disinformation, required for work in the health and education sectors.

Yes but there should be enough research conducted on each vaccination to ensure it is safe and little to no side effects

No, but allow parents the right to choose. Information should be non bias and all side effects be known

No, it is the decision of the parents, however, Covid so-called vaccines (they aren't vaccines) should be recalled and governments charged with crimes against humanity following the scamdemic

Depending on the vaccine and how long it has been studied for - New vaccines should NOT be compulsory

Yes, unless there is a medical reason, backed by 2 doctors, that doing so would be a risk to the child.

Increase education around vaccines, the risks of not having vaccines, require vaccines for deadly diseases

Yes, but independent ad campaigns should be promoted to identify risks and benefits and to ease people’s concerns. This should not be associated with any pharmaceutical company or government office.

Yes, but not for coronavirus

Yes, only if these vaccines are 100% safe

Yes, unless there is a valid reason not to