Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

No, test on criminals instead

No, only humans that have consented to being tested on and who are rewarded.

They should be tested on criminals who were going to be sentenced to death

only when necessary

No test on high profile prisoners

Drugs but not cosmetics

Use it on criminals

Test it on criminals

no its wrong

Yes, but not for cosmetics, along with proper upholding of animal rights and regular checks for this.

No, they should use violent criminals instead

Yes, but only when absolutely necessary to protect human life, and the animals should not be euthanized once they are no longer needed for testing purposes.

no. animals should NOT be used at all in any testing. instead testing should be conducted on convicted criminals such as rapists, child predators, sex traffickers, terrorists.

It should be avoided at all possible intervals and care should be taken to ensure the animals are not in pain (pain killers etc). Never for cosmetics.

No use pedophiles

Yes, but not for cosmetics. Its fine if its necessary to save human lives, but not so some can keep up with today's trends and fashions.

There should be an independent committee which can’t accept any type of funding or freebies of any sort that get to decide on each item - case by case review

These products are for humans, we should use humans. Killing an innocent life for the sake of humanity is dumb.

Yes, but there should be incredibly strict regulations and a process overseeing proper/reasonable use of said animals for testing.

Yes, but it should be as the very last resort, always humane, and never for cosmetics; animal welfare should be prioritised

Yes, as long as it’s played in a humane way. for example if the animal is suffering, put it down or treat it

Only if the product was pre-verified to prevent harm to the animal, and ethical testing protocols were adhered to.

Test it on prisoners that committed horrendous crimes of violent/sexual nature, that have been convicted with undeniable evidence

Yes for life threatening illness only, and a code of conduct on the treatment of the animals in place with strict prosecution if failure to adhere and frequent auditing.

Not for cosmetics - only essential medication and only when absolutely necessary (e.g., when the outcome for trailing on humans is below 50% known).

Yes, but not for cosmetics and further regulations should be put in place to reduce unnecessary cruelty.

Only for medicinal research or for life saving treatment but realistically we should be following the idea of one medicine

Only in the rare cases where animal testing is proven to produce reliable results for applications in human beings and never for cosmetics

No, products should be tested on convicted peadophiles as they are human and testing would be more accurate

No animal testing. Convicted violent criminals should be used instead. And no testing should be needed for cosmetics.

No, use criminals to test on. More reliable data when using a human, and they give up the right for declining once they commit a crime

Get better with algorithms and AI to do much more without and only use animals where really necessary. Certainly not for cosmetics!

Only use low intelligence animals such as mice and rats. Do not use cows, pigs, dogs, cats etc which have a high level of intelligence and awareness for research experiments.

should be allowed as we wouldn't have many other options to test drugs but the animals should be treated better and be given more care.

Yes as long as there is a sustainable source of purpose-bred animal test units available to the researcher.

We are not mice. Yes, it might work for a rat but maybe not for joanna. And no, makeup should NOT go anywhere near animals

Yes, as long as it's not fatal, or if it unintentionally is researchers do whatever they can to maintain life of the animals.

Yes as long as they can assure no harm will come to the animal and the animal won’t be in any pain or be uncomfortable during the tests

Yes, but not for cosmetics and not if there is the viable option for computer (or alternative) modelling.

yes, but only for life saving medicines where animal testing is the only option to make the drug safe.

Only if no other options exists and the thing being tested will save lives and be made open source for others to use.

only for animals with a low mental-capacity, thus reducing the chances of them feeling much pain if the tests are unsuccessful

Yes but, human and animal testing should only be allowed for products for their respective species that aren't cosmetic

However the number of animals used has to heavily regulated. As well as the animal used for what type of testing.

Yes, but not for cosmetics, and only allowed in trusted medical research companies who are required to give proof of adequate care of the animals, including safe and appropriate housing, diet and enrichment. The companies permitted to use animals in their research should also be given checks specifically and exclusively to be spent on supplies for humane care of the animals which they use.

If the similar medication have been tested with very little difference in ingredients and knowledge of the harms of the ingredients then they shouldn’t be.

Only for drugs and treatments that can help create a better quality of life, ban cosmetics testing as it doesn’t serve a practical purpose only to increase vanity

Do it in a humane way if those animals don't wanna take the drug then its for a reason and maybe test on human volunteers or pay people to test instead who can consent

medicine but after being tested be set free so tested like once and then set free. Or just banned in general it really just depends on what