Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

59 Replies

 @9QD3DSBanswered…7mos7MO

The government shouldn't be bailing out companies unless there is a significant public benefit/service they provide.

 @9Q6R8ZZanswered…7mos7MO

No, shares have with them a level of influence the government may have conflicting intrests with what is then in the best intrest of a company, the government should take out bonds from a company instead.

 @9Q36VV7answered…7mos7MO

Yes if its just a financial thing, should have no weight on company decisions as long as decisions are legally compliant

 @9PYKFSVanswered…7mos7MO

Yes if the company provides government support or contracts that need to be fulfilled companies dissolved post activity

 @9NW2GQJ answered…8mos8MO

Yes but they are required to sell after a sweet time frame. Also this should not influence with companies would bring profit by bailing out!

 @9N6F65CIndependentanswered…9mos9MO

Yes, but these shares should be passed to citizens with interest and expertise in company areas (offered to IT Professionals for IT Companies)

 @9LKM9NXanswered…10mos10MO

No, but financial assistance should come with conditions on fair work and pay and transparent tax arrangements.

 @9L4VP4Xanswered…11mos11MO

I would rather all essential industry be collectively owned by the government/citizens (water, power companies, railway, healthcare, internet, education, and related). And no industry should be "bailed out" unless it's services are still required. Private companies should only exist for luxury goods.

 @9HY5B7WConservativeanswered…1yr1Y

There should be no bailing out of companies and, if there is any, the government should acquire shares which are automatically paid off over time so the government has no stake in the company as soon as possible.

 @9GVS5TNanswered…1yr1Y

No, the government shouldn't bail out companies. In the case of utilities, etc, the government should buy as 100% share holders

 @8YPK9B4 answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but the government should be a sleeping partner and not be in a position to make decisions about how the company is run.

 @9F59S8Qanswered…1yr1Y

Yes as compensation but they shouldn't be bailing them out in the first place

 @9P3QNTSLabouranswered…8mos8MO

No but when recession is over businesses should start to payback what they were given even if just a monthly low sum of money

 @8Y7VGPHPlaid Cymruanswered…3yrs3Y

 @8G5H8G6answered…4yrs4Y

I believe the company should be able to offer the government equity in return for a bail out

 @8GXH36PConservativeanswered…4yrs4Y

No, the government shouldn't bail out private company's that cannot sustain themselves.

 @96DYH6Kanswered…2yrs2Y

No. Bailouts in corporations are a financial drain on the public sector.

 @945PBN2answered…3yrs3Y

 @944KCYYanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but only to a point. Once the bailout value has been recovered +50%.

 @dandartGreenanswered…3yrs3Y

No, the government has no business being involved in for-profit businesses

 @92FXJX5answered…3yrs3Y

 @8XXZ7JKanswered…3yrs3Y

The government should receive compensation back, but should not own shares of private companies

 @8PVRHNXanswered…4yrs4Y

Reform the system so the government should never bail out companies and banks during a recession.

 @8KJS969answered…4yrs4Y

No, I believe that the government should help create a structure within companies of broad-based employee ownership.

 @8JSPHMCanswered…4yrs4Y

Companies that can't adapt and sustain themselves should be left to die.

 @9D2Z8FTanswered…2yrs2Y

The government should not bail out failing services such as banks, transport etc

 @9CMD3K2answered…2yrs2Y

 @9CMCDL5Liberal Democratanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but the government should get a return on investment for any financial aid provided to companies

 @9BDBN9Panswered…2yrs2Y

Yes if it is reinvested into health and social care, education, cultural and environmental change.

 @99QYDG8answered…2yrs2Y

I'm against the government owning shares of private companies per se. I just think that they shouldn't use situations to gain an advantage, or leverage etc.

 @9852KL7answered…2yrs2Y

The companies should be left to fail then taken into public ownership if appropriate.

 @984VCPQConservativeanswered…2yrs2Y

The government should not interfere during recessions by bailing out companies.

 @9845GY4answered…2yrs2Y

 @93N9HPNLabouranswered…3yrs3Y

 @93K8NQ6answered…3yrs3Y

No, but there should be more options for citizen oversight since it was their tax funds used to bail out the company

 @92NNDCSanswered…3yrs3Y

Government can completely nationalise such companies if they are of such importance that they cannot let them fall into liquidation. If they are not important enough to fully acquire them, then no public money should be wasted on a buy-out.

 @8DL6F9Tanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but any money made should be spent on education, welfare and healthcare

 @9C2BTW8Labouranswered…2yrs2Y

No, public money should not be used to bail out private, profit generating businesses.

 @9BYZSK5answered…2yrs2Y

The government should not support private companies and private companies should be abolished.

 @9BTJW4Sanswered…2yrs2Y

 @99ZBJWLanswered…2yrs2Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...