Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

32.6k Replies

 @8LWFNLXanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, but in a way that demonstrates how we can learn from our mistakes and move forward into a more just society without stirring a hatred between races

 @B45V8QFanswered…3wks3W

Yes, but CRT is a university level course, that isnt even taught to primary or secondary schoolers!!!

 @ChelseaSLabour answered…10mos10MO

yes? but when in secondary (yr 9) and in specialised classes (citizenship) debates can be invited and a stance that is'nt necessarily biased.

 @9PMCQFSanswered…10mos10MO

I believe kids should be taught about the 1800s but not to be told to apologise for something that happened over 200 years ago

 @9PHG2YVGreenanswered…10mos10MO

I think religious education should be taught as to what people believe in witbout indoctrination. Extremist religious beliefs and how children can be aware of the dangers of grooming should also be taught as the level of vulnerable children, especially during the pandemic, who were targeted is appalling. This should be an area that is focused on by the government to safeguard and protect young vulnerable members of our society.

 @9NQ7QWYanswered…10mos10MO

I think it’s more important teachers get trained on this. Children and are typically away of this stuff. It’s a waste of resources to preach to the converted

 @9NDTWFKIndependentanswered…11mos11MO

History is history. If we cover slavery it should be made clear that African and Middle East had a worse track record for slavery and that English were slaves as well. Every topic we choose to cover should be wholly covered and not just selective periods out of context

 @9QFFHF3answered…10mos10MO

I think it should be taught at an age where children can understand and acknowledge the problems of racism within the world

 @9LCPJ9Sanswered…1yr1Y

Divisive and complicated. There is no need for Primary school children to learn this, I feel. Furthermore, children descended from the 'oppressive race' should not be made to feel like they are inherently bad, as much of the discourse surrounding this has done and only added to the division. It has often led to unproductive conversations and worsened racism at times. It might be that the schools are not the place to delve into something too deeply however it can be something that high school children are made aware of but no more than that. This is a stance I am too uneducated on to have a firm belief in however.

 @8TVB3D3answered…4yrs4Y

Not in its current form- Critical Race Theory is a US import and racial history in the USA is different to the UK and cannot be brought in directly. Some of these concepts are also difficult to teach well outside a highly academic context- and their usefulness in the fight against racism is debatable.

 @9BQ7NPDanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, at a suitable age where they can understand and if the teaching is fair and honest

 @99XX6FYanswered…2yrs2Y

The word racism is in itself racist as the so called races are not actually different races but all apart of the Human race.

 @92SDZFXanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and also add Intersectionality, the 1619 Project and Social Inequality to the curriculum.

 @8TBKYXGanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8RXDWTQLiberal Democratanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, because CRT is just a point of view but it should not be mandatory

 @8Y4ZD4Zanswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, but I think this should be extended to learning other forms of discrimination as well (homophobic & sexist institutions)

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...