Try the political quiz

14 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

No

 @9LP5T3Sagreed…7 days7D

There is no rational argument with evidence that embryos share enough characteristics with people to warrant giving them a higher status than other living things that share a lot more. Something that has the potential to later become a person is not the same thing as a person, because that principle holds true for literally every other combination of things. An acorn is not a tree, a tree is not a pack of printer paper, and a pack of printer paper is not a book. There are a lot of other things that need to be added to an embryo before it can become a person. If we are to consider an embryo a person, then we have to consider that an acorn is a book.

 @9LNVDD4TUSCagreed…1wk1W

There is no rational argument with evidence that embryos share enough characteristics with people to warrant giving them a higher status than other living things that share a lot more. Something that has the potential to later become a person is not the same thing as a person, because that principle holds true for literally every other combination of things. An acorn is not a tree, a tree is not a pack of printer paper, and a pack of printer paper is not a book. There are a lot of other things that need to be added to an embryo before it can become a person. If we are to consider an embryo a person, then we have to consider that an acorn is a book.

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...2mos2MO

Yes

 @9LP5T3Sdisagreed…7 days7D

If embryos are similar enough to people to be legally considered the same thing, then so are all other plants and animals. An acorn is not the same thing as an oak tree, and an architect's drawing is not the same thing as a house.

 @9LNVDD4TUSCdisagreed…1wk1W

If embryos are similar enough to people to be legally considered the same thing, then so are all other plants and animals. An acorn is not the same thing as an oak tree, and an architect's drawing is not the same thing as a house.

 @9LMW7N4answered…1wk1W

To a limited degree (i.e. that they are treated with care and given a certain amount of recognition) but not to the extent cited in the example

 @9LF7TNQanswered…3wks3W

Yes, except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the mother or embryo

 @9LDPZR3answered…3wks3W

I would have to know more about how the freezing process affects the embryos.

 @9KZGRYTanswered…1mo1MO

 @9KXWMTFWomen's Equalityanswered…1mo1MO

it it has been fertilised and past a certain stage of development then yes

 @9K87NLNanswered…2mos2MO

In as much that they should be taken care of as much as possible, but no-one is responsible if an accident happens as in Alabama.

Engagement

The historical activity of users engaging with this question.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...