The British government has received advice from its own lawyers stating that Israel has breached international humanitarian law in Gaza but has failed to make it public, according to a leaked recording obtained by the Observer.“I remain convinced the government has completed its updated assessment on whether Israel is demonstrating a commitment to international humanitarian law, and that it has concluded that Israel is not demonstrating this commitment, which is the legal determination it has to make,” she said.
“Transparency at this point is paramount, not least to uphold the international rules-based order.”The revelation will place Lord Cameron and prime minister Rishi Sunak under intense pressure because any such legal advice would mean the UK had to cease all arms sales to Israel without delay.Legal experts said that not to do so would risk putting the UK in breach of international law itself, as it would be seen as aiding and abetting war crimes by a country it was exporting arms to.
“They have not said it, they haven’t stopped arms exports. They have done a few very small sanctions on Israeli settlers and everyone internationally is agreed that settlers are illegal, that they shouldn’t be doing what they’re doing, and the ways in which they have continued and the money that’s been put in.”Kearns told the gathering that both she and Cameron believed strongly in Israel’s right to defend itself. “But the right to self-defence has a limit in law. It is not limitless,” she said, going on to suggest that Israel’s actions put its and the UK’s long-term security at risk.“Some of the ways in which Israel is prosecuting this is making their long-term security less certain. It is making our long-term security less certain. I’m amazed that our national threat level has not gone up.
And it breaks my heart because I know it could be done differently.”
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Imagine if your country was in a similar position as the UK; would you support or oppose the continuation of arms sales to a nation accused of breaking international law, and why?
@9L7WQ622yrs2Y
By continuing to provide arms we are complicit
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
How do you think the potential breach of international laws by one country affects the global community and the concept of a rules-based international order?
@9L7WQXV2yrs2Y
It gives the green light for any other country within the same economic group to breach the international law themselves
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Join in on more popular conversations.