President Joe Biden deliberately kept a low public profile following Iran’s attacks against Israel over the weekend, hoping that his absence from the spotlight would help deescalate the situation.
White House aides on Sunday discussed the idea of Biden delivering a national address after Israel, in conjunction with U.S. forces, shot down the vast majority of the 300 drone and missile launches from Iran forces seeking to avenge the killing of senior paramilitary leaders.
But while scheduling was fluid, there were no immediate plans for Biden to address an American audience on the conflict in the Middle East, according to six officials, granted anonymity to discuss sensitive internal planning.
Advisers assessed that a major presidential event, such as a televised address, would likely escalate the tensions and may provoke Tehran, two of the officials said.
“Putting the president behind the Resolute Desk turns up the temperature,” said one of those officials. “That’s something to ideally avoid.”Such an approach remains consistent with how Biden has operated throughout the conflict in the Middle East that began soon after Hamas militants attacked Israel on Oct. 7. But it has also, at times, left the impression that he is captive to events rather than using the powers of his office to shape them.
In the immediate aftermath of the Oct. 7 attacks, Biden hugged Netanayhu and then delivered a national address widely deemed as one of the most pro-Israel speeches from a sitting president.
Since then, he has largely stayed out of the fray. While he has continued to pledge support for Israel, he has also privately grown critical of its conduct of the war.
But his public condemnations of Israeli leadership for the killing of thousands of civilians in Gaza have often come in the form of an answer to a stray question from a reporter or a readout of a call with Netanyahu.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Is it more important for a leader to publicly show support during conflicts, or to strategically remain quiet?
@9LKR7GN2yrs2Y
I believe that it is important for leaders to show support as we need to know that something is being done and it can help put the public at ease instead of doing or saying nothing which may lead the public to believe nothing will be done.
@9LKPHXJLiberal Democrat2yrs2Y
They should make their stance on conflicts clear, including any conflicts of interest, and allow themselves to be judged accordingly.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Do you believe silence can be more powerful than words in tense situations?
@9LKRQHK 2yrs2Y
Yes, silence is a stance, but it's not a good one. For Biden being silent, he does more to actually convey his stance than if he were to use words to say 'I am an Israeli slave' - his silence is also communicated through actions - and his actions speak louder than his words ever could.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
Join in on more popular conversations.