Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

36 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...6mos6MO

Yes

 @9NL79WBLabourdisagreed…6mos6MO

Smart motorways are proving ineffective against broken down vehicles and emergencies. This could be improved with better monitoring, but it also requires drivers to pay more attention on the roads. The safest option is a hard shoulder which is only used in emergencies so a broken down vehicle is not in a live lane of traffic. Smart motorways are not updated effectively when a vehicle is removed causing congestion via speed limits which are no longer relevant.

 @9PJSJT8answered…5mos5MO

Yes but only if they don’t harm others, eg smart motorways removing hard shoulder = less chance of survival

 @9QLBZN8answered…5mos5MO

Yes, only if it is accompanied by reducing the amount of car traffic on the road alongside the development of affordable public transport that is owned by the public

 @9QK3MJLanswered…5mos5MO

Only if self-funded and not offered to private organisations, turns into a waste of money that never ends up getting delivered, too much profiteering. Hire directly for departments and resolve in-house.

 @9QDKMQ4answered…5mos5MO

NO! They should invest in the infrastructure to maintain the quality of the roads for ALL users. They have an MOT to make cars roadworthy, but the roads aren’t car-worthy as they are at the moment.

 @9Q2MYRXanswered…5mos5MO

Repair the basic state of the roads first. Repair potholes, clean roadsigns, repaint lines on the road etc

 @9PXRY2Tanswered…5mos5MO

It depends on what mode of transport, maybe public transport should be developed but not personal vehicles which would contribute more to CO2 emissions.

 @9MXFG7Nanswered…6mos6MO

Invest in maintenance of current infrastructure roads and improve rail and bus services

 @9MW3F8Janswered…6mos6MO

 @9MVX26Yanswered…6mos6MO

No, it should invest in high quality and well subsidised public transportation

 @9MT2LGJ answered…6mos6MO

Yes but not at the moment when we have a deficit, there are more important things to spend money on

 @9MPX63Banswered…6mos6MO

 @9MLQGR4answered…6mos6MO

What "Smart transportation infrastructure" is is very loosely defined, ranging from AI-powered speeding cameras to high speed rail

 @9P6LYBDConservativeanswered…5mos5MO

No, smart motorways are useless, removing the hard shoulder to create an extra lane causes confusion and a massive headache for cars that break down

 @9P3YQS6 answered…5mos5MO

Smart motorways haven't been a great success so I'm very hesitant about implementing any more 'smart' tech

 @9NYKRDGGreenanswered…6mos6MO

Until the technology is proven to be cheaper and technologically important, the research and testing should be more important

 @9PMSJMDLiberal Democratanswered…5mos5MO

This should be considered in future, however, much of the technology is not yet advanced enough for this to be sustainable or safe

 @9P4K8WVanswered…5mos5MO

Yes, to the extent that developments are only made and maintained in areas that are more built up and have the infrastructure in place to support these developments.

 @9NF9ZHDanswered…6mos6MO

They should redo the whole train lines and make trains the same as the new Elizabeth line and better buses however the issue isn’t to do with smart infrastructure but rather the cost of things with TfL and transport being super expensive in the uk and on top ULEZ charges. Theres no point in wasting publics tax money to build these smart infrastructure when either way whether old or new transportation it’s equally costly.

 @9NM3C9Sanswered…6mos6MO

This depends on cost and whether it takes money away from more important issues, such as poverty, healthcare and education.

 @9NJL3HBanswered…6mos6MO

If you mean smart motorways then no.. i have never believed they are safe and still dont think they are a viable option.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

If smart roads could reduce traffic but cost a lot of money to implement, would it still be worth it?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

When it comes to transportation, what’s more important to you: lower costs, fewer accidents, or reduced travel time?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Do you believe that technology can make roads safer, or do drivers have the ultimate responsibility for safety?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How might smart transportation impact the jobs of people who work in traditional traffic management or driving roles?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Do you think improving public transportation through technology is more important than investing in smart roads for cars?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Would you feel comfortable letting a smart system control your car during heavy traffic?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

In what ways do you think smart technology could improve environmental sustainability in transportation?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

Could relying too much on automated systems in transportation make us more vulnerable to technical failures?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How do you think smart transportation could affect people in rural areas versus cities?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…2mos2MO

How would your daily commute change if all traffic lights and cars could 'talk' to each other?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...