Backdoor access means that tech companies would create a way for government authorities to bypass encryption, allowing them to access private communications for surveillance and investigation. Proponents argue that it helps law enforcement and intelligence agencies prevent terrorism and criminal activities by providing necessary access to information. Opponents argue that it compromises user privacy, weakens overall security, and could be exploited by malicious actors.
@9MWR5QR2wks2W
Yes, only when significant evidence suggests a risk to national security and safety.
@9NQ65B28hrs8H
It should be implemented in extreme cases when there's a terrorism threat but not be used by police forces or government authorities to spy on or extort people's privacy
@9NPWMLQ 11hrs11H
Only when evidence exists to suggest national security is threatened; e.g. if someone comes forward to report potential abuse.
@9NLW67P2 days2D
In very specific and heavily regulated circumstances before this could happen there would need to be a huge oversoght on hpw thos was implented.
Yes but with strict reassurance for top level known threats and not witch hunts for possible crimes.
@9NL4JYY3 days3D
Yes. Although only if users of these tech companies consent to their data being accessed via backdoor access.
@9NKZ3KLConservative3 days3D
This creates vulnerabilities so the government needs to have a policy whereby national security issue concerns can be examined in a collegiate yet compulsory manner with tech companies- as law.
Subject to major controls to maintain the privacy of ordinary citizens and to prevent commercial exploitation
@9NHMTMF4 days4D
Yes, but only with significant evidence suggesting security breeches and only by very highly qualified specialists
Yes, but this should only be used in circumstances where undeniable evidence is available a person or persons are planning an attack
@9NBN8YP 4 days4D
Depends on the severity of the threat to security. Governments should raise requests to the tech companies but also prove how this will not violate GDPR concerns
@9ND5NV76 days6D
No, but if there is criminal use or materials being shared on the platform there should be protocols in place to ensure accountable of the tech company and for them to be allowed to report evidence to law enforcement when an agreed upon level of harm or risk has been reached.
@9NBB2V8Women's Equality 1wk1W
Depending on the situation it could be helpful but also privacy should be protected as it is a right.
@9NB5KQT1wk1W
This would depend on the legitimacy of the requested access. The government would need to provide a clear case for requiring any access to communications to prevent GDPR breaches
@9N8P6NK1wk1W
No, the government should require tech companies to close all backdoor access to encrypted communications for national and public security purposes.
@9MY3G7X 2wks2W
Not having ultimate access enables the Tech Companies to become malign actors without oversight. High level warrants should be required to access with as much privacy oversight as possible but in the end State security must have access.
@9MXYHT52wks2W
Only if there is sustained evidence to investigate it for a specific user/conversation
@9MWSFDJ2wks2W
Only if the companies are suspected to be engaging in criminal activity.
@9MWG7KW2wks2W
Only where robustly evidenced and demonstrated through the Courts to be in the national interest.
@9MR6S9D2wks2W
only if they could guarantee it is failsafe to use
@9MR48PS2wks2W
do not let anyone surveil citizens, there is too much chance of that power being abused
It would depend who in "government" was keeping track.
@9MQ472F2wks2W
This should only be by Court Order and by a Senior Judge
@9MPX63B2wks2W
Yes, but usage of the ability is to be publically reported and highly regulated
@9MNPPQ52wks2W
Yes, only with sign off by the Secretary of State.
@9MNDWV42wks2W
It depends on how stringent the laws to protect people’s identities and private information were. If there’s a strong chance of the information being accessed for reasons outside of very specific circumstances, then I’d say it shouldn’t happen at all. Otherwise it could very easily become a “big brother” scenario.
No, as it sets a dangerous precedent for government invasion into private communications. Give a bit, and they take it all, which is why i think if it is there only to be used for criminals, the government will still likely end up just using it to access everybody's anyhow.
@9MKHVGZ3wks3W
A third party unaffiliated oversight group should have access to a backdoor to which the government could lodge requests with
The historical activity of users engaging with this question.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...