Faced with crisis, Vladimir Putin tends to freeze.
Moscow’s slow, fumbling military response to Ukraine’s surprise occupation of parts of the western Kursk region is the latest example of the Kremlin chief failing to respond with quick, decisive action to match his bellicose rhetoric.
The Kursk incursion is the fourth major blow to Putin’s authority since his February 2022 invasion of Ukraine and highlights the weaknesses of a top-down autocracy that operates largely on fear and punishment.
Four days after Putin tasked Russia’s military with driving out Ukrainian forces, it was clear that an attack initially seen as a short-term nuisance — a “provocation” in Putin’s words — was increasingly likely to take Russian forces weeks or months to address.
“It’s always the same style.
Putin likes to keep everything secret. When he appears publicly, he doesn’t say much.
He prefers not to be alarmist,” said Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of France-based analytical group R. Politik.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
@ISIDEWITH2yrs2Y
In what ways do you think fear and punishment can impact a country's ability to respond to emergencies compared to a more open form of government?
@9SBYN5X2yrs2Y
In that kind of environment, people close to the leadership are afraid to speak hard truths. Lying and sugar coating are incentivized. When you terrify your citizens into line they have no real loyalty, in an emergency everyone's out for themselves.
Join in on more popular conversations.
