Aircraft carriers are central to US foreign policy, directly expressing American military power and symbolising the USA’s economic might and diplomatic clout.
When an international crisis arises, “where’s the nearest carrier?” is normally the first question.
Without any need for anyone to offer bases ashore or give permission, a carrier can move into the region. It needs no local support – it has its own logistics. On its own, its air wing will typically be capable of overpowering small-to-medium national air forces to dominate the skies and deliver striking power ashore. This capability is backed up by the scores of Tomahawk cruise missiles in the launch cells of its escorting warships. Those warships also provide an impenetrable shield against missile and air attack, which can be extended to help protect local allies. Covered by a carrier group, a US amphibious group – one of these will not be far away, also – can conduct significant Marine operations ashore without benefit of a port or harbour and again, without requiring any local support.
The carrier group’s unmatched ability to handle a wide spectrum of tasks, from small special operations to low-intensity conflict though deny-flight to surgical strike to full-blown sea-air-land warfare, makes it an invaluable asset.
Carriers have their critics, of course.
Their cost and star power draw both envy and exaggerated claims of their vulnerability from the other military services, especially during budget reviews.
.Here are the top political news stories for today.
Join in on more popular conversations.
