Try the political quiz
+

100 Replies

 @B42469Ganswered…1wk1W

No, but increase the tax-free allowance and reform so the tax rate is based on the wealth of the recipient rather than the deceased

 @9V44C4Nanswered…6mos6MO

No, but they should reform the tax, to make it easier to inherit in low to middle middle-class families.

 @9LJT4MRanswered…12mos12MO

Yes, it's double taxation, but only after the tax system is reformed to remove loopholes so you can guarantee tax has been correctly and fairly paid in the first place.

 @9JYMMMQanswered…1yr1Y

The tax free allowance should be increased, and the tax should be applied to the received inheritance per inheritor, not to the estate as a whole.

 @9J3L3H2Conservative answered…1yr1Y

Yes, but only if it is more than two years after the end of the current cost of living crisis (inflation brought below 2% and the economy growing by 5%)

 @9G576MJanswered…1yr1Y

No it is a tax that is good for the economy. This is because if someone inherits a large sum of money they will be less incentivized to work but if that money is taxed they will be more incentivized to contribute to the economy

 @9D5BVFHanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, the person you inherit off has payed tax on that money already. They have worked hard, paid their tax and left their wealth to the beneficiaries of their choice. The beneficiary should not have to pay tax again

 @9C9982Qanswered…2yrs2Y

100% inheritance tax so that money is released back into the economy for every generation instead of hoarded wealth.

 @9BNPC3YLabouranswered…2yrs2Y

Disallow inheritance above a small amount. Inherited wealth is very bad for society.

 @95W27KVanswered…3yrs3Y

Increase the rate of inheritance tax so that the individual is wealthy on their own merits not their ancestors.

 @92RWMJManswered…3yrs3Y

No, Inheritance, is one of the main causes of inequality. Inheritance should be taxed more than any other form of wealth

 @9QK948Wanswered…9mos9MO

It depends on the amount. Poor and middle class people shouldn't have to pay taxes on their inheritance. Rich people should keep paying taxes. If we would abolish the inheritance tax, rich people would get richer and this would increase the social and economical fracture between the poor/middle classes and the rich class.

 @9QBWSJBLabour answered…9mos9MO

No, they should have a max cap on inheritance. If the money above the cap isn’t spent, it should go back into the country’s education and healthcare sectors.

 @9NWMNCManswered…10mos10MO

No, implement a 100% inheritance tax to eradicate generational wealth and get money into circulation to bolster the economy

 @9NTVFS6answered…10mos10MO

No. Maintain the current non-taxable amount and ensure that we are only taxing on any amounts above that. Say the value of the estate is £400k, we only tax on 75k

 @9NPX5SDanswered…10mos10MO

No, but make less loopholes for generational wealth in trusts etc. and don't punish unmarried people.

 @9NKKMRQIndependentanswered…10mos10MO

It is absolutely outrageous that we are being charged money to access our own family heritage. It's unfair and completely unjustified.

 @9LP4YWZanswered…11mos11MO

Absolutely, we pay tax all our working career then pay tax on our pension withdrawals as well as taxed when we purchase goods fuel etc therefore any wealth or inheritance should be passed on freely as a bonus to our own

 @9BH9999answered…2yrs2Y

Absolutely not!! Nobody should be become rich without contributing to society. Inheritance tax should be steeply graduated once it goes above a certain level

 @9BCZ3R7answered…2yrs2Y

 @9B3DHLPUKIPanswered…2yrs2Y

Why when you inherit should you pay tax on the money someone already paid tax on so they could leave something of benefit to family and friends for their future.

 @9PWDD5L answered…9mos9MO

No but it should be reduced drastically as parents are taxed throughout their lives, the recipient must not lose the benefits of inheritance due to their parent passing away

 @9PP54D6answered…9mos9MO

No. Inherited wealth is a major driver of inequality. Inheritance tax should be increased and loopholes removed.

 @9PL6N3Hanswered…9mos9MO

No. The loop holes around trusts also need to be reformed to stop the generational passing of huge swathes of wealth.

 @9PH23P5answered…9mos9MO

If tax on the money etc. has already been paid by the deceased, then tax should not be paid again by the recipient.

 @9P6D95Manswered…10mos10MO

No, and increase it to 100% over a low cap to allow for personal effects. Also crack down on loopholes.

 @9P68HQCanswered…10mos10MO

No, but increase the tax-free allowance to £1,000,000 and decrease the tax rate to 20% of any balance over the the allowance

 @9PWBNRSanswered…9mos9MO

There should be a long-term aim to abolish IHT, with an immediate aim to raise the threshold to £1,500,000 per person over the lifetime of the new parliament.

 @9PPPYQYanswered…9mos9MO

There should be a 100% inheritance tax, why should the rich be allowed to hoard generational wealth while the rest of us suffer an ever widening wealth gap.

 @8TM88WQGreenanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, inheritance is completely legitimate as i came from family or close people

 @8TLYBBBanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, along with "inheritance" as a whole. Rather, inheritance should go into a trust fund, which would subsequently replace their need for any state welfare.

 @clthreeoneeightanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8SST2LYanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8SP2KKPanswered…4yrs4Y

podatek spadkowy w pierwszej lini pokrewienstwa powinien byc zniesiony w ogole, tak by rodzice w pelni mogli przekazac dorobek swojego zycia dzieciom

 @8SLLC2Yanswered…4yrs4Y

No, but make avoidance more difficult so that the super rich don't get away with paying none with clever accounting

 @8SLJW6Zanswered…4yrs4Y

No but significantly increase personal tax free allowance ie £300,000 per person. Do not punish someone for saving and working hard.

 @8SK6DMWanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes but it should also abolish capital gains tax on inheritance. People work all their lives to obtain these assets paying sdlt and income taxes. Why should this be taxed again.

 @8RXWH3Hanswered…4yrs4Y

There should be a set maximum amount of inheritance, e.g. £500,000, and anything above that goes to the government. This amount should not be taxed.

 @8R76YVFanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes get rid of it,the government needs that tax just to pay for lazy bottoms on the welfare benefit system.

 @8QRNVDNanswered…4yrs4Y

No, reform it based on both the amount to be inherited and the wealth of the recipient.

 @8QPWX5Vanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8Q5DX2Kanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, the money and possessions are ownership, savings and hard earn't to be passed down to next of kin. The government should have no right to try and claim any of that in tax or otherwise.

 @8KJS969answered…4yrs4Y

Yes, I would instead gain income tax from any gains from transfers of property received as inheritance or gifts and I’d cap income tax at 20%.

 @8HR9ZM5answered…4yrs4Y

No, and impose a limit on the amount a single person can inherit but pay towards funerals

 @8GDC8KXanswered…4yrs4Y

Its the most important tax to preserve capitalism from a return of feudalism. It should be enforced zealously

 @8D2FGC3answered…5yrs5Y

 @9D355DLanswered…2yrs2Y

Yes, and replace it with a Lifetime Receipts Tax (LRT) on assets valued at £2 million or more

 @9CJHNNWLiberal Democratanswered…2yrs2Y

No, raise the threshold to £1 million and then raise the rate to 75% above the threshold

 @9CHKRKRanswered…2yrs2Y

No - increase the tax free allowance and increase the rate above that threshold

 @99PB67Mfrom Pennsylvania  answered…2yrs2Y

No, but the inheritance tax should not be applied to savings or trusts that were taxed upon the depositing of the funds they contain.

 @99D64CKanswered…2yrs2Y

 @99C8FJ2answered…2yrs2Y

Free allowance and not income support as well is so the worth of tax Dexter with more decrease no longer enquiries

 @98M8BPFanswered…2yrs2Y

inheritance tax should be increase who receive over 60 000 for those who receive below 60 000 should shouldn't be taxed

 @98627JWanswered…2yrs2Y

No, the tax-free allowance should be lowered as it is currently far too high.

 @96Q83M5Labouranswered…2yrs2Y

Make it progressive again. Instead of a flat 40% what about 30% for the first £1,000,000 and then 50% for above this figure? Do not make it based upon recipient's wealth as this would increase tax avoidance.

 @962538Canswered…2yrs2Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...