Should the government increase or decrease foreign aid spending?

Foreign aid should be provided for disasters, controls should be in place to avoid corruption in use of these funds.

Increase but ensure this is for investment and measure outcomes. No funding for corrupt officials and cancel debt.

Maintain but only to to support countries with societal and economic issues insurmountable without support not finding countries with larger GDPs

Stick with the current amount of spending but decrease or stop the amount for countries with human rights violations.

Decrease, unless we are directly involved. And deny aid to countries that violate human rights or promote terrorism

Has there been any analysis into what would happen if we stopped, or if all the more advanced countries stopped collectively? And everyone look after their own. With emergency aid due to natural disaster like floods, earthquakes tsunami, fires, still being supported

Increase, but only when the cost of living crisis has been neutralised. Additionally, the UK shouldn’t provide any supplies to countries openly against British Values except for humanitarian efforts/civilian aid

Any change to foreign aid should be on redistribution of the wealth this country stole within colonialism

Yes but only for poor countries who do not have the capability to provide aid to themselves/where their government is also doing all that it can

Foreign aid is only appropriate if it’s strategically allocated to support the sustainable development of the countries that need it the most.

Maintain, but re-evaluate recipients to not include countries with no human rights violations or links to terrorism

Foreign aid should be applied by a body of the British government.

We should limit foreign aid to disaster funds.

Neither, but more direct gifting needs to be used as this is the most effective tool for aiding foreign development.

Increase, but take measures against corrupt governments that may missuse such aid. maybe refuse financial aid completely, and only provide aid of products, time, logisitcs, and people

Only if we are sure the aid isn't redirected to their military

Influence other cpuntries policies and reduce aid.

increase but send durectly to people in need if the government is corrupt

We should maintain the UN percentage of GDP that we originally ratified with aid money not being directed to nations that are able to afford high tech space programmes and nuclear industries.

Decrease, and we should not give foreign aid to any countries, such ventures should be solely charitable.

decrease until we’ve reformed it our foreign aid system

Stop funding countries who have space programs

Stay the same but change how it is spent

We should decrease or remove support depending on the countries that have a support for terrorism.

Increase, under strict and non company bias terms to avoid bro colonialism

Neither, however deny aid to dictatorship, countries that harbour or promote terrorism or violate human rights

Help any country who is willing to stand up to China.

Give fair amounts to people who need it

Decrease based on how that foreign aid is spent and where the aid is actually going to e.g. just the higher ups in the government or the people that need it.

More complicated that increasing/decreasing

It depends on the country and if/how much they need it. Funds should be spent on the people in need.

Decrease temporarily until the government can aid their own country out of the cost of living crisis

Increase, but not for countries with their own space program

Make sure the money we give is actually used, not wasted/ misused by foreign governments