This considers limiting the integration of advanced technologies in vehicles to ensure humans retain control and to prevent dependency on technological systems. Proponents argue that it preserves human control and prevents over-reliance on potentially fallible technology. Opponents argue that it hinders technological progress and the benefits that advanced technology can bring to safety and efficiency.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
@B2DPVVS3mos3MO
Yes, but with exceptions made for transportation designed to increase accessibility for people unable to drive.
@9QDPJZY9mos9MO
No, this is likely to reduce car accidents however make everyone take cognitive tests in the case that human control is needed.
The use of autonomous vehicles should be regulated but I think it should lean more towards being used to help the disabled have more independence and freedom.
@9QBZ592 9mos9MO
We are heading in that direction. There is a need for more safety bu also reliance on the safety protocols
@9P3XRYD 10mos10MO
Yes, vehicles should have active, passive and autonomous safety systems but should remain primarily human operated.
@9P26G3610mos10MO
Too complex for a yes/no answer, but this should be debated and a decision made based on factual information and a balance of practicality and morality.
@9NXXS6S10mos10MO
No, but it should be very carefully tested first to see if it improves safety, and regulated to ensure the best safety outcomes.
Somewhat, the government should consider restrictions on the use of advanced technology in vehicles to maintain human control.
@9PP8NJV9mos9MO
Some sort of magnetic road device to connect car to road to control speed and aid assisted motoring is OK but not entire reliance on a self drive intelligence.
@9PLDXCW9mos9MO
No but they should be independently safety regulated and approved by the regulation authority before being employed in vehicles
Yes and no, it benefits those who’s are disabled or struggle with transport who rely on the technology
@9PHWRXW9mos9MO
It should , but there should be regulare reviews and assessments of the ongoing state of technology to see whether and when the technology is better than unassisted humans at preventing death, injury and accidents
@9P8KB2Y10mos10MO
No, technology will pave the way for fully-automated vehicles which will give disabled people more independence and mobility as long as fully-automated vehicles are safe
@9P7M63P10mos10MO
Depends on the technology; at the very least things like self driving needs to be restricted more as the tech isn't there yet. Prevent companies like Tesla from essentially making paying customers and other road users beta testers for buggy and poorly designed tech.
@9P6LYBDConservative10mos10MO
No, installing systems like auto emergency braking and lane control would save hundreds of accidents a year
@9PXP3CS9mos9MO
Yes, but only to reduce the number of hours a worker needs to drive. The AI can be used to bring the work week of the typical driver back down to 40 hours. Sharing the load could improve the lives of overworked employees, without replacing them entirely.
@9PWDD5L 9mos9MO
I think regulated will work better to ensure that people are not replaced and jobless. The use of advanced technology benefits all but it should not be at the cost of people’s jobs and livelihoods
@9PVBH659mos9MO
This would be useful for those with disabilities but in general i believe it creates more complications
@9P68LMM10mos10MO
Technology advancement is beneficial but we need to know when enough is enough. We can achieve amazing things with technology but we still need to have some control and responsibility over our own lives. Instead of, for example, cars that drive themselves we should focus on ensuring protection over computerised systems and ensuring they cannot be hacked or taken down causing things like healthcare to come to a stand still. There have been several hacks recently that have impacted shops and healthcare so perhaps we should focus on improving technology in these types of area rather than things that could be considered a luxury item. Technology for security of the public and our country should be the priority not 'big boys toys'.
No, but dependent on what the future technological innovations are
@9N3Z7RH 10mos10MO
Within reason yes, but technology is useful as long as it isn't solely relied on
@9MPQ8FVLiberal Democrat10mos10MO
Eventually, but it needs to be developed and proved safe first
@9PRKPDQ9mos9MO
Yes, the only possible allowance for automated vehicles is for disability/illness that would otherwise prevent driving
@9PRGGCL9mos9MO
Not allow AI to completely drive a vehicle. Must have a driver with a current clear driving licence in charge of the vehicle even if sometimes AI drives it.
@9NJL3HB10mos10MO
Think this is too new to give a realistic response. The the technology is not quite there yet to rely on 100%. But would be useful to act as a limiter for newly trained drivers to limit speed and silly actions we see all to often on todays roads. Plus maybe have something that picks up if the driver has taken drugs/alcohol would be hugely useful.
@9NCQM5DIndependent10mos10MO
Instigate publicly funded development and testing of systems that fulfill and meet the technical and ethical issues involved with self driving technologies. Manufacturers need to use this technology or develop one that meets or exceeds it.
@9N6RTQX10mos10MO
Yes and No. Technology such as carplay that includes maps as well as parking cameras and detectors. However shef driving cars pose a risk.
Oversight on this issue needs to be reevaluated regularly as the technology is proven out
@9MYLL6Z10mos10MO
depends on if the technology is required or necessary to the vehicle itself
@9MRML9610mos10MO
yes until proven safe and when the company accepts criminal responsibility when that tech causes accidents
@9PRYXCW9mos9MO
Yes, but to look into black box recorders in all new vehicles in order to take bad drivers off of the road.
@9NLZF7N10mos10MO
I think there needs to be some human control. But there is a lot of technology that can make things a lot safer, Just make it so it doesn’t just shut off for a super long time like some smart motorway stuff
@9NJR5LJ 10mos10MO
Yes, if the risk of harm is higher than human use. Only allow well studied technologies with correct policies.
No, not restrict, but keep it the same as it is currently.
@9MPVK8L10mos10MO
No, they should mandate as a requirement. It should be like planes where it is required and are fully automated, much safer and do not succumb to human error, drink/drug driving etc. Humans can then take over in the event of a major issue.
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
@ISIDEWITH7mos7MO
Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion
Loading data...
Join in on more popular conversations.