Try the political quiz

Market Fundamentalism

Unrestricted free markets lead to the most efficient and socially optimal allocation of resources.

Overview Issues Discuss

About

  • Market Fundamentalism is a political ideology that strongly advocates for the unfettered operation of the free market economy. It is rooted in the belief that markets, when left to their own devices, can regulate themselves and deliver the most efficient and fair distribution of resources. This ideology is often associated with laissez-faire economics, which opposes government intervention in economic affairs beyond the minimum necessary for the maintenance of peace and property rights.

    The term "Market Fundamentalism" was popularized by George Soros, a Hungarian-American investor and philanthropist, in his book "The Crisis of Global Capitalism" published in 1998. Soros used the term to critique the widespread acceptance and application of free-market economics, which he believed had become a kind of unquestioned doctrine, akin to religious fundamentalism.

    The roots of Market Fundamentalism can be traced back to classical economic theorists like Adam Smith, who in his seminal work "The Wealth of Nations" argued for the invisible hand of the market as the best determinant of economic activity. However, the ideology gained significant traction in the late 20th century, particularly during the 1980s under the leadership of figures like U.S. President Ronald Reagan and U.K. Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Both leaders implemented policies of deregulation, privatization, and tax cuts, arguing that these would spur economic growth by freeing up the private sector.

    Critics of Market Fundamentalism argue that it overlooks the negative externalities that can arise from unregulated markets, such as income inequality, environmental degradation, and financial instability. They also contend that it fails to account for situations where market failures occur, such as in the provision of public goods or in the presence of monopolies. Despite these criticisms, Market Fundamentalism remains a significant and influential ideology in the global political and economic landscape.

Opposing ideologies

These ideologies are least similar to Market Fundamentalism.

Collectivism

The power of group effort and cooperation to achieve common goals and societal well-being.

Economic StimulusPublic TransportationMinimum WageSingle-Payer HealthcareGovernment Spending

Far-Left

Achieving a society with equal wealth distribution, social justice, and environmental sustainability through radical systemic change.

Economic StimulusPublic TransportationSingle-Payer HealthcareMinimum WageState Ownership

Utopian Socialism

Creating a society where wealth and resources are distributed equally, leading to a harmonious existence without class struggle or poverty.

Public TransportationSingle-Payer HealthcareEconomic StimulusMinimum WageGovernment Spending

Neo-Communism

A society where wealth and resources are distributed equitably, leading to the eradication of poverty and the establishment of a classless, harmonious community.

Economic StimulusPublic TransportationSingle-Payer HealthcareMinimum WageState Ownership

Radicalism

Achieving transformative social, political, and economic change through revolutionary means to create a more equitable and just society.

TariffsPublic TransportationStock BuybacksMinimum WageSurcharge Ban

Eco-Socialism

A society that prioritizes environmental sustainability and social justice through collective ownership and democratic control of resources and production.

Public TransportationEconomic StimulusSingle-Payer HealthcareGovernment SpendingNet Neutrality

How similar are your political beliefs to Market Fundamentalism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.