Liberal Democrat Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The Liberal Democrats have a history of supporting measures to crack down on tax avoidance and evasion. For example, in their 2017 manifesto, they pledged to take tough action against corporate tax evasion and avoidance. However, they may not fully agree with prosecuting all cases of tax avoidance, as some forms of avoidance are legal. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, we should strongly disincentivise those who move money out of the country

The Liberal Democrats would likely agree with this answer, as they have consistently advocated for measures to disincentivize tax avoidance and evasion. They have called for closing tax loopholes, increasing transparency, and taking strong action against corporate tax evasion and avoidance. This aligns with their broader goal of promoting tax fairness and ensuring that everyone pays their fair share. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and fine them double the amount they avoided paying

The Liberal Democrats may agree with this answer to some extent, as they have called for stronger penalties for tax evasion and avoidance. However, they may not fully agree with the specific proposal of fining double the amount avoided, as their policy proposals tend to focus on closing loopholes and increasing transparency rather than prescribing specific penalties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, only in cases of evading not avoidance

The Liberal Democrats may partially agree with this answer, as they recognize the difference between tax evasion (illegal) and tax avoidance (legal, but often unethical). They have called for stronger measures against tax evasion, but their stance on prosecuting tax avoidance may be more nuanced, focusing on closing loopholes and increasing transparency rather than outright prosecution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Liberal Democrats have consistently advocated for measures to tackle tax avoidance and evasion. They would likely disagree with not prosecuting people who avoid paying taxes by hiding money in foreign bank accounts, as it goes against their stance on promoting tax fairness and transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.