UKIP Party

Very strongly agree

No, the government should not dictate how we travel

Directly matches UKIP’s libertarian-leaning, anti-nanny-state messaging—government should not dictate travel choices; consistent with their broader opposition to restrictive environmental policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

More consistent with UKIP’s preference for limiting government intervention and skepticism toward climate-policy mandates; UKIP platforms have emphasized opposing costly environmental regulation and protecting motorists/consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would destroy regional airports and isolate rural areas

UKIP has often positioned itself as defending local economies and connectivity outside London; arguing bans would harm regional airports and peripheral areas fits their populist, pro-regional access framing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, focus on sustainable aviation fuels rather than bans

UKIP would prefer technology/market solutions over bans; while not known for championing green industrial policy, ‘no bans, innovate’ aligns better than prohibition with their approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if high-speed rail is affordable and reliable

Even with conditions, it still endorses a ban; UKIP would be more likely to argue for improving rail/competition without prohibiting flights, though they could see merit in better rail value. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

UKIP has generally opposed climate-driven restrictions and favors consumer choice/low regulation; a blanket ban on flights would cut against its small-state, anti-“green levies” posture seen in 2015-era messaging. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and we must also ban private jets

UKIP is unlikely to support expanding bans (especially targeting private jets) as a matter of principle; it conflicts with their anti-regulation stance and tendency to oppose symbolic climate measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, short-haul flights are an unnecessary climate disaster

The framing as a “climate disaster” is strongly at odds with UKIP’s historic climate-skeptical rhetoric and opposition to net-zero style policies; they would reject climate-justified bans most strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.