The World Health Organization was founded in 1948 and is a specialized agency of the United Nations whose main objective is “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.” The organization provides technical assistance to countries, sets international health standards and guidelines, and collects data on global health issues through the World Health Survey. The WHO has led global public health efforts including the development of an Ebola Vaccine and the near-eradication of polio and smallpox. The organization is run by a decision-making body composed…
Read more77% Yes |
23% No |
64% Yes |
18% No |
9% Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute |
3% No, fund national and local programs instead |
3% Yes, but decrease the amount |
1% No, it has shown to be ineffective |
1% Yes, and increase the amount |
See how support for each position on “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 20.4k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “World Health Organization” has changed over time for 20.4k UK voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from UK users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
@9D6RN5Q9mos9MO
Decrease the amount and fund more national and local programs instead
@9CZPTF89mos9MO
In principle I think we should contribute to some funding of the WHO but not to the detriment of our own NHS which is on its knees
@9CQBF7G10mos10MO
Decrease the amount and fund national and local programmes
@9C96FHK11mos11MO
Decrease and divert more funding to national and local programs instead
@99YKL3H1yr1Y
Each country should pay a % based on GDP.
@98FB6H61yr1Y
No, it's shown its self to be ineffective; fund national and local proggrames instead.
Stay up-to-date on the most recent “World Health Organization” news articles, updated frequently.
Explore other topics that are important to UK voters.