Try the political quiz
+

Answer Overview

Response rates from 29k UK voters.

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 29k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 29k UK voters.

Loading data...

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from UK voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

 @BDCVFMCanswered…2mos2MO

They shouldn’t just be allowed to go rogue and offer things that haven’t been approved. However scientific advances change so quickly and differentiating around the world, so sometimes you should be allowed to to try new approaches if there is some evidence based around its success elsewhere. There has to be a first time for everything, but it must be in the interest of the patient and not be medical notoriety or financial benefit to the medical professional.

 @BDCG9NBanswered…2mos2MO

Yes, if they prove to be harmful to the patient and have not been transparent nor did not disclosed any information on potential side effects.

 @B8TPPX6answered…7mos7MO

Yes. The doctors should not lose their medical licence after one offence. However, multiple offences (3, or so), and they should get it taken away.

 @B7R47ZRanswered…8mos8MO

Their advice should be agreed upon by at least three others and be based in scientific research, there should be some sort of proof behind their advice.

 @B7BJ8HBanswered…9mos9MO

Yes, but only if the doctors didn’t disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

 @B75LXZKanswered…9mos9MO

No, doctors should be allowed to try new ideas given full consent by the patient, but should not be allowed to advertise or pressure patients.

 @9ZPK6TLanswered…2yrs2Y

Doctors should be required to disclose the contradiction and if the advice is taken and goes wrong both sides should be held accountable for the decision. With more accountability on the doctor's end, (so yes to a degree.)

About This Data

Based on 29k responses to this question.

These results come from iSideWith's ongoing political issues survey. We collect over a million responses per day, filter out duplicate and multiple submissions, and break the results down by political party, ideology, age, state, and census demographics (income, race, education, household).

iSideWith is non-partisan — we don't advocate for any party, candidate, or position. We report what the public tells us.

Read Our Full Methodology →

Cite Or Embed This Poll

Writing about this issue? Use the live data and link back to the full results.

Cite This Poll

iSideWith. (2026). “Should medical boards penalize doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus?” — Public Opinion Poll Results. Retrieved June 21, 2026, from https://uk.isidewith.com/poll/4934271436

Embed The Live Result

Preview