Fuel efficiency standards set the required average fuel economy for vehicles, aiming to reduce fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Proponents argue that it helps reduce emissions, save consumers money on fuel, and decrease reliance on fossil fuels. Opponents argue that it raises production costs, leading to higher vehicle prices, and may not have a significant impact on overall emissions.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Parish
Response rates from 195 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
72% Yes |
28% No |
72% Yes |
28% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 195 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 195 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Non-Civil Parish or Community voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9P7HMZG5mos5MO
Vehicles over a certain age should be exempt as not everyone can afford to purchase a more efficient vehicle
@9QVHCQ64mos4MO
Certain people depend on their careers and need for their vehicle should have less stricter regulations.
@9QK948W5mos5MO
To make higher standards work, the pricing on the rest of the elements in the chain such as fuel, cars, taxes etc have to be fixed under a certain amount so the consumer doesn't become a hostage of the pricing.
@9QJZ97C 5mos5MO
No, they should be stricter on usage of Private Jets, and should increase such strict standards and tax penalties to those who consume and put the world at risk the most - the RICH.
@9QH5JDZ5mos5MO
It makes me laugh to think that the UK are imposing all these fuel and emission tax’s, when it doesn’t have an economy and people in the Uk are poor, where is the money for electric cars 🤔
@9QBJKNB5mos5MO
Only if it does not have a significantly negative effect solely on motorists. All stakeholders should absorb the financial burden of transitioning
@ISIDEWITH5mos5MO
Yes, but only for new imports, not second hand cars, the buying of which prevents pollution and waste.
@9Q3F9QQ5mos5MO
Yes but this needs to come with subsidies for less wealthy people to buy more fuel efficient vehicles
Join in on the most popular conversations.
