Diesel emissions standards regulate the amount of pollutants that diesel engines can emit to reduce air pollution. Proponents argue that stricter standards improve air quality and public health by reducing harmful emissions. Opponents argue that it increases costs for manufacturers and consumers and could reduce the availability of diesel vehicles.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
Voting for candidate
Parish
Response rates from 1.9k WC2 voters.
57% Yes |
43% No |
57% Yes |
43% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 1.9k WC2 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 1.9k WC2 voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from WC2 voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9P63ZVG6mos6MO
No, wait until clean technology is readily available and affordable before reducing the use of combustion.
@9P9RZHH6mos6MO
Yes but only after the necessary infrastructure has been implemented with affordable alternatives widely rolled out.
@9P8TYPP6mos6MO
Diesel is actually more economical and more environmentally friendly than petrol for long distance driving. So it's a grey area
@9P524BT6mos6MO
i think it is a difficult question to answer as it could lead to the loss of jobs and business crisis however it limits the amount of carbon into the world
@9P2TDNG6mos6MO
depends because some people cannot afford other vehicles but also stricter emissions standards would improve the environment
@9P3YDBB6mos6MO
No, Wait until cleaner technologies become more accessible and less expensive. The carbon emission reduction is being rushed.
@9V75Z8N3mos3MO
Yes, but have these emission standards be relative to income. Those who are impoverished may be pardoned more compared to those who are rich. Gradually, as socialism becomes established, implement a more universal standard.
@9SMRS8B4mos4MO
The UK is a green zone stop looking at the UK and look to the east where there is a clear pollutance
Join in on the most popular conversations.
