Proponents argue that it would preserve cultural heritage and appeal to those who value traditional designs. Opponents argue that it would stifle innovation and limit the design freedom of car manufacturers.
Statistics are shown for this demographic
City
Response rates from 180 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
13% Yes |
87% No |
13% Yes |
87% No |
Trend of support over time for each answer from 180 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Trend of how important this issue is for 180 Non-Civil Parish or Community voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Non-Civil Parish or Community voters whose views went beyond the provided options.
@9MZG39H6mos6MO
I don’t see this as an issue worth worrying about.
@9MVX26Y6mos6MO
No, are there genuinely people arguing this? These people are bonkers.
@9QYFPYK4mos4MO
No but give incentives to have aesthetic choices, allow for new design but also seek to reserve culture & older design
@9MYTVMB6mos6MO
That just daft fuel economy efficiency etc is priority surely
@9N27SDJ6mos6MO
I think classic and contemporary designs should be available. Choice is what should be available.
@9N2268Q6mos6MO
No, but stop making automobiles so big, it increases risk of damage.
@9NJ2LXV6mos6MO
No, but make 'classic' style bodywork an optional extra or separate model, so long as it meets modern safety standards
@9MY48WG6mos6MO
Regardless, the MP's should decide in a parliament bill
Join in on the most popular conversations.
