Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
经济 › 豪宅税
4>4 Personal answerYes, especially since the government has issued the bedroom tax, targeting many lower income families. Having seen local residents forced to move out of their homes because they cannot afford the bedroom tax, they should also bring in the mansion tax. The wealthy have not seen any tax increases under this government, theirs have been cut, yet the lower class families have been far worse off especially due to services cut by the same government that's cutting taxes for the higher class. |
经济 › 社会福利
4>4 Personal answerIt cannot be denied that there are frauds within the benefit system, and that some reform is needed. A possible idea is to implement a kosher like system. Bakeries that have a kosher license are able to be inspected at any time without warning, and if they fail to meet those requirements upon inspection, that license is removed. To make sure you do not end up with bureaucrats severely breaching the right to privacy, this kosher like check should happen twice a year, which is something that the recipient must agree to in order to claim benefits. If they are found to be dishonestly using that money for other gains, then it can be agreed whether to cut or scrap that person's benefits. |
经济 › 年轻的效益索赔
4>4 Personal answer是的和每一个有能力的人,声称好处应采取无偿的社区工作 |
国内政策 › 上议院
4>4 Personal answerThe Lords Spiritual must be removed, as it includes religion in state, and religion should not get a say in issues such as taxation. If the House of Lords is to become an elected chamber, then there should be different requirements to the House of Commons. This is because the House of Lords, whilst admittedly not democratic, has been a valuable check on the power of the House of Commons. They are much more serious than the jeering mess of the other chamber. To have a wholly elected body without separate requirements will leave the Lords to be another jeering house and leave a government with far too much power, since there will no longer be any other checks against them. |
移民 › 技术移民
4>4 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
经济 › 卧室税
4>4 Personal answer是的但是对于那些残疾家庭成员的例外 |
教育 › 免费学校
4>4 Personal answer没有,免费学校转移资金从现有的学校 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on environmentalism and anthropocentrism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on nationalism and globalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “left wing”, meaning you more often support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on multiculturalism and assimilation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “big government”, meaning you more often believe the government should do more to address social inequality, corruption, and assistance for its citizens. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “decentralization”, meaning you believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on religious and secular issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You side slightly towards “militarism”, meaning you more often believe we should use whatever force necessary to protect ourselves against foreign threats. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 4 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 6 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.