Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
医保 › NHS私有化
5>5 Personal answerNot only should public services remain public in perpetuity, attempting to sell them off should be outlawed to the point of felony. |
移民 › 恐怖嫌疑分子驱逐出境
5>5 Personal answerYes, and deport any who commit a crime except in cases of self defence. |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
5>5 Personal answerYes, but with equal focus on military training, education, and skill development. |
教育 › 学费
5>5 Personal answerStudents are the future of British productivity and competitiveness. If tuition must be paid for, the fold it into the taxes they will pay. This will massively reduce the individual burden, as it will be incorporated into their taxes, and will barely notice it at all, and make money available to fund colleges and universities. |
经济 › 税率
5>5 Personal answerEliminate tax loopholes for all, and raise the top rate of income tax to 25% for 500,000 and over, 50% for 1000,000 and over, and 75% for 1000,000,000, and over. |
医保 › NHS 利润偿还
5>5 Personal answerPrivate concerns, although potentially vital suppliers to the NHS, should have no direct involvement in the NHS. The standard of care would suffer as a result of overpreponderance of priority on profit. And yes. |
经济 › 儿童福利金
5>5 Personal answerNo, but both parents must be UK born and permanent residents. |
教育 › 普通中等教育证书考试
5>5 Personal answerThere should be a vocational equivalent. |
教育 › 标准化的课程
5>5 Personal answerThere should be specialist schools for children who have already decided what career they wish to peruse, along side regular schools with flexible curricula to maintain pupil interest , and ensure no child is bored. Also, we should let children play for longer, and start at least semi-formal schooling later. |
经济 › 年轻的效益索赔
5>5 Personal answerPay jobseekers to look for work. As in actual employment, is you don't seek (work), you don't get paid. |
国内政策 › 上议院
5>5 Personal answerThe current antiquated systems of government should be brushed into the dustpan of the past, then dumped into the dustbin of history, where they firmly belong. We must ban the first past the post system, only electing the prime minister, not the party. All the parties are to be involved, to one degree or another, in policy making, subject to Senate approval. Speaking of which, the House of Lords must be replaced by the House of the Senate. Any policies proposed by any of the parties is to be subject to the approval of the party impartial Senate. How much any party will be involved, if at all, in law and policy making will be decided by the Senators via a majority rules vote. |
医保 › 紧急医疗服务
5>5 Personal answerOnly if they can afford to pay for it, with every penny going to the NHS. |
经济 › 奖金上限
5>5 Personal answerNationalize the banks, merge them all into the Bank of England, and workers to be rewarded bonuses based on their success, and pay docked for failure. Especially is any failure is caused by incompetence and/or negligence. |
国内政策 › 国家服务
5>5 Personal answerYes, but with equal focus on military training, education, and skill development. |
移民 › 技术移民
5>5 Personal answer减少,而且政府应该更多地鼓励我国公民为担任这些工作做好准备。 |
国内政策 › 毒品政策
5>5 Personal answerAddicts should be brought into protective custody and made wards of the state. Once securely in custody, they should be, under observation and control of an appropriate physician, be given the drug/s they were taking. The dosage/rd of any drug/s should be gradually replaced in incremental amounts on a monthly basis. Depending on the class of drug/s, the dosage should be either decreased, or the decrease replaced by a weaker equivalent drug, pending by the physician. Dealers should be, depending on class/es of drug/s dealt, stripped of their merchandise and proceeds there from, to life imprisonment or death, and total seizure of ALL proceeds, assets and property short of causing hardship to their families. |
国内政策 › 西洛锡安问题
5>5 Personal answerChange the status of the home nations to provinces, with some devolved powers, this will unite us like never before. Then rename the provinces as follows; England would become Anglia. Northern Ireland would become Hibernia (as could the Republic of Ireland, if they consent to join. If not, then they shall remain as is. Scotland would become Caledonia. Wales would become Cambria, and Britain as a whole would become Britannia. This would unite us all as a people, improve our standing on the world stage, better integrate our economy, and allow for better enforcement of law. |
教育 › 文法学校
5>5 Personal answerIf children are not, short of absolutely essential subjects, forced to study what does not interest them, standards would in time improve. |
环境 › 转基因食品
5>5 Personal answerAny GM food product must be vigorously, rigorously, and thoroughly tested before even seeing the light of day, let alone released to the market. |
外交政策 › 北约
5>5 Personal answer不,我们不应该保卫那些在军事防御方面开销不足其国内生产总值 (GDP) 2%的北约 (NATO) 国家 |
经济 › 卧室税
5>5 Personal answerWhere people are left in such a property through no fault of their own, they should not loose out on benefits. It should be made a lot easier for them to move to somewhere smaller, but not pushed into doing so if they don't want to. |
交通运输 › 伦敦地铁
5>5 Personal answerYes, but only if the workers are never given reason to strike in the first place. |
国内政策 › 威尔士大会
5>5 Personal answerAll should be granted the same. |
国内政策 › 反社会行为令(ASBOs)
5>5 Personal answerGood citizenship should be part of the national curriculum by law. Where this proves inadequate, troublemakers, especially persistent ones, should be sent to secure re'education centres where they will be subject to a 'carrot and stick' type of system. |
经济 › 跨大西洋贸易和投资伙伴
5>5 Personal answerABSOLUTELY NOT!!!!!!!! This evil, rapacious proposal will hand ALL the power to corporations, (I.e., they could sue ANY national government if they pass any laws that they don't like) and put consumers in possibly mortal danger by undermining quality of products and services. This deal must be killed off post haste! |
交通运输 › 高速度 2
5>5 Personal answerIf parts of it can be threaded underground, especially where established settlements would be threatened, then yes. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
You side slightly towards “deregulation”, meaning you more often believe that government regulation stifles innovation and economic prosperity. 这一主题是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on environmentalism and anthropocentrism issues. 这个主题是对你更重要。
You side slightly towards “keynesian”, meaning you more often believe the government should provide economic assistance to stabilize the economy. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on unilateralism and multilateralism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on politically incorrect and politically correct issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on collectivism and individualism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on nationalism and globalism issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You are a centrist on authoritarian and libertarian issues. 这个主题是对你比较重要。
You side slightly towards “left wing”, meaning you more often support policies that promote social and economic equality. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on capitalism and democratic socialism issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on multiculturalism and assimilation issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “protectionism”, meaning you believe globalization is detrimental to the safety, compensation, environment, and standard of living of workers. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side slightly towards “big government”, meaning you more often believe the government should do more to address social inequality, corruption, and assistance for its citizens. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You side moderately towards “decentralization”, meaning you believe that administrative power and decision making should be handled at the local level and serve the best interests of the local community. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on tender and tough issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on traditional and progressive issues. 这个主题是只有不到重要的是你。
You are a centrist on religious and secular issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You side slightly towards “militarism”, meaning you more often believe we should use whatever force necessary to protect ourselves against foreign threats. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
You are a centrist on isolationism and imperialism issues. 这一主题只是对你最重要的。
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 9 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 5 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 12 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.