Currently UK trains are operated by private franchises and the tracks are operated by the government. Proponents argue that the system would run more efficiently if the tracks and trains were operated by private entities. Opponents of privatization claim that a single government train system would end the disruptions caused by the fractured franchise system.
Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
Political party:
@9PW7LYP9mos9MO
It should be nationalised but be run by people who know what their roles include. People who have worked in the roles they would be in charge of
@9PN893Q9mos9MO
Yes, but it needs to have punishable contracts that mean if passengers suffer, they are compensated without having to appeal, where appropriate. Only allow them to make a certain amount of profit and the remaing profit invested back into the infrastructure. Some money can be put aside to help deal with compensation but if not used anually, is split between profit and infrastructure
@9PH4XND10mos10MO
It doesn't matter, just make sure there are enough workers and that trains actually turn up on time. The current rail network is a shambles.
@9P78QLX10mos10MO
Fines on rail services companies that don't achieve sufficient performance criteria. Fines given back to service users
@9P6TDWP10mos10MO
I'm divided on the topic, as a big trainspotter there are benefits and downsides to both privatisation and nationalisation.
@9NRLT8610mos10MO
Hire in loads of japanese people to run the UK railways so they are efficient. Japanese people love making railways efficient.
It’s useless and unreliable under current conditions it needs to change so it’s more reliable and cost effective
Yes but only if they are held under strict guidelines that they must invest a % of their profits on maintenance & services without hiking prices up disproportionately
@9N3PGPXLiberal Democrat10mos10MO
A hybrid stance of freight privatisation but passenger rail, and the track operation, should be in public hands.
@9M3DCXS11mos11MO
Privatization of the railways has led to increased prices and poor quality of service while shareholders regularly make huge profits.
@9M3CR8611mos11MO
I just think the strikes are getting out of hand and they need to realise that their actions are getting really selfish as people are losing jobs because of the trains not running.
@9JZM429 1yr1Y
Privatised networks have only been proven to be better in rare cases, such as Grand Central, but on the whole, nationalising the railways has proved to be much more efficient.
@9QF653H9mos9MO
The railways should be publicly owned and operated. The whole of the uk should be linked via a network. More people would use the trains cutting carbon and making the train the quickest cheapest option for travel. European trains are incredible. Why don’t we have this in the Uk?
@9Q3GW579mos9MO
Yes but restrict pricing, ideally reducing it from where it is now and government overseas service level agreements from private companies
@9PK3R9N9mos9MO
should have an overhaul so costs can be bought down and salaries that warrant the jobs implemented and the workers work hard
@9MRC28N10mos10MO
I'm neutral in who owns it (Public or Private), but it should be heavily regulated either way to ensure that the outcome of the train companies always puts people first. The ticket system also needs to be modernized and favor the customer, rather than seeing customers have to pay admin fees and penalties when claiming back on tickets for trains that never turned up, were cancelled or delayed such that the journey was no longer practical.
@8S9SHS74yrs4Y
We should focus on more important things right now.
@95FD25XConservative3yrs3Y
Yes, but pay wages that attract talented management
@93HM5HR3yrs3Y
it can be a viewing sence , so they can look at hte old british locomotive as it is like a museum.
@93DKWRW3yrs3Y
Restore the original British rail structure, prior to privatisation.
@93D6W753yrs3Y
Yes as long as standards are maintained
@8S5LRH84yrs4Y
Yes but increased regulation and better demand better services
Rail companies should be independent government
@8RJBZD24yrs4Y
Private companies, regulated by the government with elements of worker participation. Similar to TFL but with more worker participation.
@8QVHR6L4yrs4Y
They should be nationalised but still ran as separate franchises and like businesses returning profit to the treasury - LNER/East Coast Trains as the example there.
@8QM43PG4yrs4Y
Private trains is fine, private tracks is unsafe.
@8QM42FJ4yrs4Y
Yes, but should be a regulated natural monopoly like Yorkshire Waters.
@8Q9J8Z5Liberal Democrat4yrs4Y
No but private companies should contribute to infrastructure
@8Q54M5T4yrs4Y
Yes, if it means there will be better quality service
@8PYXW9Q4yrs4Y
I think trains should be free and be put into tax bills contributions. As the cost to travel is essential for people to earn shouldn’t have a pay to earn.
@8PXZLKM4yrs4Y
Yes, but allow further Government insight to ensure the system gets refined, this allows for a better service and fairer price for commuters.
@8PWVNQ94yrs4Y
the trains to be run by everyone not the state. the people
@8PV9PNR4yrs4Y
Yes but only if the service is good
@8PHYGNZ4yrs4Y
Whatever is best for the consumer
@8PF9PPT4yrs4Y
No, and put them into more local control
@8PD9JY34yrs4Y
no, as there are only a limited amount of providers IE northern rail and so competition wont be applicable/viable, you can't compete against yourself. However privatisation leads to more competitiveness
@8C57P9Y5yrs5Y
Group into 4 main railway companies
@9CH57ZX2yrs2Y
Yes but ith a cap on train fairs
@9BQWBV5Liberal Democrat2yrs2Y
Either privet or nationalised but if privet one company overseeing the entire network
@9B65DTSConservative2yrs2Y
If a government was to have nationalised it before I was PM, I would not reverse the change.
@99WZ73G2yrs2Y
I feel they should be nationalised to reduce ticket prices but at the same time agree to regularly invest in the trains and carry out upgrades
@99DK25G2yrs2Y
Yes, only trains not tracks
@996ZFZW2yrs2Y
Either way the price of tickets needs to come down.
@98WHK8K2yrs2Y
No, but the government should have some control.
@9858GD42yrs2Y
Should be managed and owned privately but should receive government subsidisation.
@9757DBN2yrs2Y
Privatisation only works if it’s in benefit of the people.
@96ZWZYK2yrs2Y
Some routes should stay national
@93X27P33yrs3Y
Allow privatisation where it is needed.
@8SGS47H4yrs4Y
No as look what happened with northern rail. The government can be held accountable at least
@8Q3J3F84yrs4Y
Don’t have strong opinion
@8PPV4FV4yrs4Y
@8GF2RZH4yrs4Y
Yes, but only if this service is run more efficiently and cheaper than state controlled rail
@92P86X93yrs3Y
yes, but the Government needs to have much more oversight of the contracts
@8XWDGFM3yrs3Y
yes but with a price cap
Yes, but the UK Government should reward public contracts to railway companies to operate the trains, whilst the government operates the tracks and sets fare prices.
@8XF8GBCConservative3yrs3Y
Allow the government to operate and maintain the tracks, with the ability to set fare prices. The government should pay private railway companies to operate the trains and any revenue collected, via fares set by the government and collected by the private sector companies, is to be reinvested into improving the services.
@8XBW4MY3yrs3Y
Nationalise the tracks, and privatise the trains
@8WVZ47PConservative3yrs3Y
Yes and government should stop their high regulations in the railway and on that stop setting ticket prices
@8VK4YMD4yrs4Y
i don't understand any of these questions
@8TBMVCKConservative4yrs4Y
Yes, but abolish the franchise system in favour of concession contracts
@8T8JDZK4yrs4Y
Have it partially privatised, partially nationalised.
@8SKR82G4yrs4Y
Rarely use trains not an issue for me
@9DNGL6H2yrs2Y
No, because of capitalism encouraging everyone to become greedy.
The political themes of 71.2k users that upvoted this question
Join in on more popular conversations.