Should the House of Lords be abolished?

The structure of the HOL should be revised. Abolish hereditary perrages and limit number of life time appointees on an annual basis and apply an emprical selection criteria

I think it's important to have a fixed group of people to over see Government. I don't believe that had to be through peerage and privilege.

No but lifetime and child peerages should be removed, and there should be elected lords and maximum terms

No, but it should be reformed and appointments should be made in a non-partisan way on the basis of expertise

No, an unelected second house is important for critical professional view of laws, but it should consist only of experts

No, it is important to have reviews before implementation. But it should be reformed to be made up from field experts who would be able to review policies and laws without bias, and the appointment system should also be reformed to reflect this.

Reformed, not abolished. No hereditary seats. No religion within the house unless earned through merit. People must be voted for.

it should be replaced by a house of highly educated individuas who are/have been at the top of their field

No it should be drastically reformed, with the total removal of hereditary and spiritual peers and the introduction of terms.

No, because it is a check on the government. But, it needs some serious work to fix some of the issues that have come to light recently.

No, but abolish Hereditary Peers; Lords Spiritual and increase the limitations on appointments against the PM and Leader of the Opposition

No but they system should be changed

No, but restrict appointments and advice solely to the Appointments Commission and the Monarch, excluding the PM from the process, and abolish hereditary peers.

If we keep the system of House of lords then we should regulate how someone can earn this position. This includes nepotism and bribery.

No, but it should be reformed to be made up of people specialising in job roles/sectors who are tested

Yes - Put everything up to public vote with the necessary security to prevent perverse behaviour. Let the public decide its fate rather than an unrepresentative group.

Reform to Statesmen and include heads of universities, religious leaders, Union Heads and business moguls so the most powerful in thr country are displayed instead of a political career class

should be modernised

No, but hereditary peers should be removed.

The King should be the head of this country.

Yes but there should be a second house of scrutiny.

Yes and replace with a citizems assembly made of experts with experience and knowledge in broad and from many various streams of society. Jury service style call up

The goverment shouldn't be abolished but more power should be given to the monarch.

I mean. They're all **** right?

Yes, but replace with a house filled with experts on all possible relevant issues

Yes, as long as it is replaced with a new, elected second house.

No, but should be democratically elected after meeting a set of criteria including being able to moderate bias

No but there needs to be a democratic process in reaching the House of Lords.

No, but it should be reformed to be more representative of society

No, but there should be more diverse representation

No, but have them all elected my the population.

Membership should be massively reduced and election should be done independently of governments. Hererditary peerages should end.

No, but it should be elected by proportional representation

Yes, and democratize the House of Lords as an upper chamber of the bicameral parliament.

Yes, but replace it with a Senate

Yes it should be replaced by elected persons who represent a region eg south east England, north west England, South Wales etc.

Replaced on meritocracy

Change it slightly

A Second Chamber is necessary but the Lords is useless. An elected second body would be better

No, instead the House of Lords should be returned and overhauled to better befit a modern purpose within the British political process.

Appointed members predicated upon genuine educational and political grounding aid in stability, however, to achieve such a position educational and social opportunities and welfare for the country must be wholly bettered, as to allow for bettered representation for the ‘working masses’. Education being key in terms of proportional representation, with a focus on preventing misinformation as a keystone of politicking, and the removal of hereditary peers and bishops.

not completely as are good for a general opinion however should

No but it should be a wholly elected body.

Reform to remove life peerages

No but to become a Lord and vote in the house of lords you must have contributed to society in a notable way through medicine or military service.

Piers should be elected.

No, but it shoudl be voted on by back benchers who play a part in pushing new policies through

It should be reformed into an elective body

No, but reform or to be elected and proportionate

Yes, but it must be replaced with a second chamber that is not aligned with party politics

A revamp would be better

No, but significant reform, including removing hereditary and religious peerages

No and we should return the House of Lords to a mixture of hereditary peers and cross-faith ecclesiarchy.

No, but the number of Lords should be reduced

Yes, as should the House of Commons.

No, but increase diversity

No, but it needs to be restructured so that it is not just hereditary, and it needs to be scrutinised to ensure that the people in there are really the best at making decisions, instead of just put there because the Prime Minister likes them.

There should be no hereditary peers

No, but it should have no hereditary peers, bishops etc. The Lords should be a meritocracy protortionately appointed by politicians in the commons

yes - replace with an elected senate or have direct democracy

Members through heratige and inheriting the position should be removed and every vote of each lord should be public information

No but we should defund them.