Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @9PR5KK6answered…9mos9MO

No, but it should be elected and no political donors should have a seat. In aid of ending corruption and getting back to true democracy

 @9NTYNCFanswered…10mos10MO

Replaced with an upper chamber of appointees from a pool of applying candidates selected according to merit and talent, not as political appointees or temporal/spiritual peers.

 @9JGRTBV answered…1yr1Y

The entire system needs to be modified and reformed, but with the rest of the system as it currently stands we need to keep the House of Lords to filter out some of the worse commons legislation

 @9J2R6MJLiberal Democratanswered…1yr1Y

Yes, but be replaced with a elected high house that represents county level constituents. There also needs to be maximum terms, to prevent a US style system whereby people are senators for 40 years.

 @93DLB6Nanswered…3yrs3Y

Hereditary Peers should be abolished, but experts in their fields should not.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...