Try the political quiz
+

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

Reply

 @9QTTLNWLiberal Democratanswered…9mos9MO

No, but instead of it being lords, should be the best expert in each field of science and literature eg. climate, history etc.

 @9FH2DVLanswered…2yrs2Y

No, but it should be reformed into an elected chamber, using proportional representation.

 @9DBXDB4answered…2yrs2Y

 @8ZPWFNPConservativeanswered…3yrs3Y

No but it needs limiting and members should have a maximum of 10 years as members

 @8Z4Z5KQanswered…3yrs3Y

We should retain a second chamber but amend the process whereby its members are appointed - e.g. via proportional representation or representatives of a variety of public/private sector employees and self-employed/unemployed/stay-at-home parents, elderly etc - i.e. representative of demographic groups

 @8YCG22Ganswered…3yrs3Y

Yes, and replaced with a House of Academia where a professor from each of the top ranked UK universities serves, allowing some of the smartest individuals to help run the nation.

 @8TGQ3XNanswered…4yrs4Y

 @8S8VZMMGreenanswered…4yrs4Y

Yes, unless it is made either more proportionate or less influential to legislation

 @8GP2TQ2answered…4yrs4Y

No but renamed the Upper House and be a elected chamber on a PR system.

 @9CH3GKJanswered…2yrs2Y

 @998SR8Ranswered…2yrs2Y

No, but it should move towards being a representative body based on expertise rather than hereditary titles