Try the political quiz
+

15 Replies

 @9PWDD5L answered…9mos9MO

Yes but you should require a hunting permit and issue quotas for the amount of foxes that are allowed to be hunted by a person within a year

 @9NMKFSQanswered…10mos10MO

No. But individuals whose poultry/livestock are damaged by foxes should not be punished for hunting down said fox with a dog as long as it is not exposed to undue suffering.

 @9P6LYBDConservativeanswered…10mos10MO

No, it's cruel, if there is an issue with foxes in an area then the natural predator of the fox should be introduced

 @9TNG7SCAnimal Welfareanswered…7mos7MO

I think that there should be a limit to what dogs can hunt. For example, dogs can hunt birds and pheasants but not animals such as foxes, sheep ect.

 @9QJB5RRanswered…9mos9MO

No, it is cruel, tradition can be upheld with ‘clean boot’ hunts and the current laws should be enforced properly

 @9KQLQMS answered…1yr1Y

I don't support the act of the sport itself but I do support the right for farmers etc to protect their live stock if threatened.

 @9FD2255answered…2yrs2Y

yes, only if a person needs to survive, out of spite should not be recommended

 @8YTYF58Liberal Democratanswered…3yrs3Y

yes, only if there is no fox involved and a man-made scent should be followed

 @8VSY84Lanswered…4yrs4Y

Whilst I wouldn’t support hunting personally, I think cheap meat and poor animal welfare affects far more animals and gas implications for both animal and human health and welfare

 @8SJHQSTLibertariananswered…4yrs4Y

I do not support it, but I condemn it as a cruel and needless entertainment.

 @8W5K929answered…4yrs4Y

 @93CQTSTanswered…3yrs3Y

I do not support it publicly but I understand and respect it’s benefits.

 @8NJ9SMQanswered…4yrs4Y

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...