Should internet service providers be allowed to speed up access to popular websites (that pay higher rates) at the expense of slowing down access to less popular websites (that pay lower rates)?

Yes, only if it's strictly based on a pay-per-quality model, then it would make the internet faster and more reliable for users.

Treat all traffic equally as otherwise competition will be removed and artificial scarcity would be created, leading to a price hike.

No, treat all the same and I don't believe Internet providers should be able to meddle with speed, particularly to end users via phone line companies. This should be illegal and business should set the example

Yes, but this should be available as a separate contract that you buy, and be cheaper than just regular internet, and also should be made very clear that this is the case.

It depends on the website's content.

Yes, as long as there's a maximum to the level of disparity they are allowed to create

Not too sure.

Equal acces

No, and enshrine net neutrality into law

No treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet and this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity and increase prices.

No furthermore they should publicly and accurately report their speeds and latency, with live graphs.

Speed everything up

Should be down to the websites popularity and no the fee they pay the provider

No, equal access!

This would lead to big news corps like CNN getting more than smaller news stations reducing freedom of press and information and stopping certain viewpoints from coming across

Yes but only if they state in the package that they do so and which websites they are.

yes, but make a nationalized internet provider that speeds up government websites and shuts down websites for religious reasons

The government should stay away from the internet industry

No, although maybe they should give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website).

Speed up popular websites dont slow down unpopular ones

Yes, but I would prefer if they don't.

No, the internet should be controlled by the government like China and they should see only what we want them to see

Yes - but only at times that are busy such as Christmas or boxing day

People still do like the others leaset ones and will be annoyed

yes but with an established watchdog to set rates and penalise companies that abuse their power.

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website), this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

Yes but measured by popularity not pay

No, it should be the same speed all around.

No, I believe that that they should just censor any websites which are judged by the British courts to be of a critical nature

Things would currently stay as they are, unless a petition was successful in getting a vote via Liquid Democracy.

The UK should enact strong, legally binding net neutrality laws to ensure all internet traffic is treated equally, while also recognizing universal, high-speed internet access as a fundamental public utility to be provided to all citizens, thereby preventing the creation of a digital hierarchy and promoting social mobility.