Try the political quiz
+

Filter by type

Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.

Filter by author

Narrow down the conversation to these participants:

353 Replies

 @8WN4Z4Lanswered…3yrs3Y

Nope should be people that are used for testing as in people who have committed murder rape ect

 @8VB49BPLibertariananswered…4yrs4Y

If these animals are being treated humanely then there should be no problems.

 @8THY8DKanswered…4yrs4Y

All testing should be carried out on people who are guilty of crimes committed against children, rapists, terrorists, traitors and murderers!

 @8QGVXSZanswered…4yrs4Y

I think we should test non cosmetics as long as no serious harm is caused and testing is stopped if this occurs. More checks should be carried out regularly

 @95ZR3W5answered…3yrs3Y

make animal testing something that has to be authorised by the government or a gov department which manages animal safety and/or preservation of life or animal rights. And make testing extremly unprecedented.

 @8ZY9DSWanswered…3yrs3Y

No, only use volunteers and criminals who are awaiting the death penalty

 @8VJ7MGJanswered…4yrs4Y

Use those sentenced for paedophilia or certain types of murder to test the safety of these

 @8QJ78BLanswered…4yrs4Y

Not cosmetics. If testing has serious affects than testing should stop.

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...